iBeLink BM-N3 vs iBeLink BM-S3+
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-N3 | Specification | iBeLink BM-S3+ |
|---|---|---|
| 25.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 25.0 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Power Consumption | 3,400 W |
| 132.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 136.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| — | Weight | 14.0 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithm | Blake2b-sia |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-N3
iBeLink BM-S3+
Based on BTC price of $76,909 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the iBeLink BM-N3, which leads on 3 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, power consumption, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 3% better efficiency (132 vs 136 J/TH). The iBeLink BM-S3+ holds the edge in home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The iBeLink BM-N3 and iBeLink BM-S3+ diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- iBeLink BM-N3 3% better power draw (3,300 vs 3,400 W)
- iBeLink BM-N3 3% better efficiency (132 vs 136 J/TH)
- iBeLink BM-S3+ 3% more heat output (11,260 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink BM-S3+ 64% more home mining score (22.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| iBeLink BM-N3 | Metric | iBeLink BM-S3+ |
|---|---|---|
| $980 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,299 |
| -$7.04 | Daily net profit | -$7.28 |
| -$3,548 | Net after 1 year | -$5,954 |
| -$6,116 | Net after 2 years | -$8,610 |
| -$8,684 | Net after 3 years | -$11,265 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink BM-S3+Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink BM-N3132.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iBeLink BM-N3 or iBeLink BM-S3+ more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink BM-N3 is more profitable at $-7.04/day compared to $-7.28/day for the iBeLink BM-S3+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the iBeLink BM-N3 or the iBeLink BM-S3+ better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The iBeLink BM-S3+ is quieter at 75 dB compared to the iBeLink BM-N3 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the iBeLink BM-N3 or iBeLink BM-S3+?
The iBeLink BM-S3+ scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iBeLink BM-N3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iBeLink BM-N3 and iBeLink BM-S3+?
The iBeLink BM-N3 runs at 132.0 J/TH while the iBeLink BM-S3+ runs at 136.0 J/TH — a difference of 4.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 3% better efficiency (132 vs 136 J/TH).