iBeLink BM-KS Max vs iBeLink BM-S3+
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-KS Max | Specification | iBeLink BM-S3+ |
|---|---|---|
| 11.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 25.0 TH/s |
| 3,400 W | Power Consumption | 3,400 W |
| 309.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 136.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 12.2 kg | Weight | 14.0 kg |
| 11,601 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | Blake2b-sia |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-KS Max
iBeLink BM-S3+
Based on BTC price of $76,909 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the iBeLink BM-S3+, which leads on 3 of 3 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 127% more hashrate (11.0 vs 25.0 TH/s). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The iBeLink BM-KS Max and iBeLink BM-S3+ diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- iBeLink BM-S3+ 127% more hashrate (11.0 vs 25.0 TH/s)
- iBeLink BM-S3+ 56% better efficiency (309 vs 136 J/TH)
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 13% better weight (12.2 vs 14.0 kg)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| iBeLink BM-KS Max | Metric | iBeLink BM-S3+ |
|---|---|---|
| $1,799 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,299 |
| -$7.77 | Daily net profit | -$7.28 |
| -$4,635 | Net after 1 year | -$5,954 |
| -$7,472 | Net after 2 years | -$8,610 |
| -$10,308 | Net after 3 years | -$11,265 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink BM-S3+136.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
iBeLink BM-KS Max vs iBeLink BM-S3+: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink BM-S3+ is more profitable at $-7.28/day compared to $-7.77/day for the iBeLink BM-KS Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the iBeLink BM-KS Max or the iBeLink BM-S3+ better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the iBeLink BM-KS Max or the iBeLink BM-S3+?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
iBeLink BM-KS Max vs iBeLink BM-S3+: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The iBeLink BM-KS Max runs at 309.1 J/TH while the iBeLink BM-S3+ runs at 136.0 J/TH — a difference of 173.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 56% better efficiency (309 vs 136 J/TH).