iBeLink BM-N1 vs iBeLink BM-S3+
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-N1 | Specification | iBeLink BM-S3+ |
|---|---|---|
| 6.6 TH/s | Hashrate | 25.0 TH/s |
| 2,400 W | Power Consumption | 3,400 W |
| 363.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 136.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 9,900.0 kg | Weight | 14.0 kg |
| 8,189 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithm | Blake2b-sia |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-N1
iBeLink BM-S3+
Based on BTC price of $76,909 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the iBeLink BM-S3+ edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 279% more hashrate (6.6 vs 25.0 TH/s). The iBeLink BM-N1 holds the edge in power consumption. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the iBeLink BM-N1 and iBeLink BM-S3+ actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- iBeLink BM-S3+ 279% more hashrate (6.6 vs 25.0 TH/s)
- iBeLink BM-N1 29% better power draw (2,400 vs 3,400 W)
- iBeLink BM-S3+ 63% better efficiency (364 vs 136 J/TH)
- iBeLink BM-S3+ 100% better weight (9,900.0 vs 14.0 kg)
- iBeLink BM-S3+ 42% more heat output (8,189 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink BM-S3+ 38% more home mining score (26.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| iBeLink BM-N1 | Metric | iBeLink BM-S3+ |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,299 |
| -$5.53 | Daily net profit | -$7.28 |
| -$2,017 | Net after 1 year | -$5,954 |
| -$4,034 | Net after 2 years | -$8,610 |
| -$6,051 | Net after 3 years | -$11,265 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink BM-S3+Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink BM-S3+136.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
iBeLink BM-N1 vs iBeLink BM-S3+: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink BM-N1 is more profitable at $-5.53/day compared to $-7.28/day for the iBeLink BM-S3+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
iBeLink BM-N1 vs iBeLink BM-S3+: which runs at a lower noise level?
The iBeLink BM-S3+ is quieter at 75 dB compared to the iBeLink BM-N1 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
iBeLink BM-N1 vs iBeLink BM-S3+: which fits a residential setup better?
The iBeLink BM-S3+ scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the iBeLink BM-N1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the iBeLink BM-N1 and iBeLink BM-S3+ on J/TH?
The iBeLink BM-N1 runs at 363.6 J/TH while the iBeLink BM-S3+ runs at 136.0 J/TH — a difference of 227.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 63% better efficiency (364 vs 136 J/TH).