iBeLink BM-S1 Max vs Goldshell SC5 Pro II
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-S1 Max | Specification | Goldshell SC5 Pro II |
|---|---|---|
| 12.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 14.0 TH/s |
| 3,150 W | Power Consumption | 3,300 W |
| 262.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 235.7 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 9,000.0 kg | Weight | 11.5 kg |
| 10,748 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,260 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2b-sia | Algorithm | Blake2b-sia |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-S1 Max
Goldshell SC5 Pro II
Based on BTC price of $76,982 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell SC5 Pro II edges it: 3 of 4 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 17% more hashrate (12.0 vs 14.0 TH/s). The iBeLink BM-S1 Max holds the edge in power consumption. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iBeLink BM-S1 Max and Goldshell SC5 Pro II sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell SC5 Pro II 17% more hashrate (12.0 vs 14.0 TH/s)
- iBeLink BM-S1 Max 5% better power draw (3,150 vs 3,300 W)
- Goldshell SC5 Pro II 10% better efficiency (263 vs 236 J/TH)
- Goldshell SC5 Pro II 100% better weight (9,000.0 vs 11.5 kg)
- Goldshell SC5 Pro II 5% more heat output (10,748 vs 11,260 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| iBeLink BM-S1 Max | Metric | Goldshell SC5 Pro II |
|---|---|---|
| $899 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $630 |
| -$7.13 | Daily net profit | -$7.42 |
| -$3,503 | Net after 1 year | -$3,340 |
| -$6,107 | Net after 2 years | -$6,050 |
| -$8,712 | Net after 3 years | -$8,759 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell SC5 Pro II235.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
iBeLink BM-S1 Max vs Goldshell SC5 Pro II: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink BM-S1 Max is more profitable at $-7.13/day compared to $-7.42/day for the Goldshell SC5 Pro II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iBeLink BM-S1 Max or Goldshell SC5 Pro II?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the iBeLink BM-S1 Max or the Goldshell SC5 Pro II?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
How far apart are the iBeLink BM-S1 Max and Goldshell SC5 Pro II on J/TH?
The iBeLink BM-S1 Max runs at 262.5 J/TH while the Goldshell SC5 Pro II runs at 235.7 J/TH — a difference of 26.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 10% better efficiency (263 vs 236 J/TH).