iBeLink BM-S1 vs iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-S1 | Specification | iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner |
|---|---|---|
| 6.8 TH/s | Hashrate | 19.0 TH/s |
| 2,350 W | Power Consumption | 3,100 W |
| 345.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 163.2 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 9,000.0 kg | Weight | 14.0 kg |
| 8,018 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,577 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2b-sia | Algorithm | Blake2b-sia |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-S1
iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner
Based on BTC price of $76,967 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner wins on 5 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). The standout gap is 179% more hashrate (6.8 vs 19.0 TH/s) in the iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner's favour. The iBeLink BM-S1 claws back ground on power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the iBeLink BM-S1 and iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner 179% more hashrate (6.8 vs 19.0 TH/s)
- iBeLink BM-S1 24% better power draw (2,350 vs 3,100 W)
- iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner 53% better efficiency (346 vs 163 J/TH)
- iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner 100% better weight (9,000.0 vs 14.0 kg)
- iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner 32% more heat output (8,018 vs 10,577 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner 38% more home mining score (26.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| iBeLink BM-S1 | Metric | iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner |
|---|---|---|
| $768 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,330 |
| -$5.40 | Daily net profit | -$6.77 |
| -$2,739 | Net after 1 year | -$3,800 |
| -$4,709 | Net after 2 years | -$6,270 |
| -$6,680 | Net after 3 years | -$8,740 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin MinerScore: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner163.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the iBeLink BM-S1 or the iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink BM-S1 is more profitable at $-5.40/day compared to $-6.77/day for the iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iBeLink BM-S1 or iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner?
The iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner is quieter at 75 dB compared to the iBeLink BM-S1 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the iBeLink BM-S1 or the iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner?
The iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the iBeLink BM-S1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iBeLink BM-S1 and iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner?
The iBeLink BM-S1 runs at 345.6 J/TH while the iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner runs at 163.2 J/TH — a difference of 182.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 53% better efficiency (346 vs 163 J/TH).