iBeLink BM-S1 vs Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-S1 | Specification | Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 6.8 TH/s | Hashrate | 8.0 TH/s |
| 2,350 W | Power Consumption | 2,020 W |
| 345.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 252.5 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 55 dB |
| 9,000.0 kg | Weight | 13.1 kg |
| 8,018 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,892 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 54/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2b-sia | Algorithm | Blake2b-sia |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-S1
Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th)
Based on BTC price of $76,967 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 27% better efficiency (346 vs 253 J/TH) in the Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th)'s favour. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iBeLink BM-S1 and Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) 18% more hashrate (6.8 vs 8.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) 14% better power draw (2,350 vs 2,020 W)
- Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) 27% better efficiency (346 vs 253 J/TH)
- Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) 100% better weight (9,000.0 vs 13.1 kg)
- iBeLink BM-S1 16% more heat output (8,018 vs 6,892 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) 108% more home mining score (26.0 vs 54.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| iBeLink BM-S1 | Metric | Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $768 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$5.40 | Daily net profit | -$4.56 |
| -$2,739 | Net after 1 year | -$1,666 |
| -$4,709 | Net after 2 years | -$3,332 |
| -$6,680 | Net after 3 years | -$4,998 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th)Score: 54/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th)252.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iBeLink BM-S1 or Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) is more profitable at $-4.56/day compared to $-5.40/day for the iBeLink BM-S1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iBeLink BM-S1 or Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th)?
The Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) is quieter at 55 dB compared to the iBeLink BM-S1 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the iBeLink BM-S1 or the Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th)?
The Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) scores 54/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the iBeLink BM-S1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iBeLink BM-S1 and Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th)?
The iBeLink BM-S1 runs at 345.6 J/TH while the Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) runs at 252.5 J/TH — a difference of 93.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 27% better efficiency (346 vs 253 J/TH).