Goldshell CK-BOX vs Goldshell CK6
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell CK-BOX | Specification | Goldshell CK6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1.1 TH/s | Hashrate | 19.3 TH/s |
| 215 W | Power Consumption | 3,300 W |
| 204.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 171.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 2,000.0 kg | Weight | 8,500.0 kg |
| 734 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,260 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithm | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell CK-BOX
Goldshell CK6
Based on BTC price of $78,265 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell CK6 comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 1738% more hashrate (1.1 vs 19.3 TH/s). The Goldshell CK-BOX claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell CK-BOX and Goldshell CK6 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell CK6 1738% more hashrate (1.1 vs 19.3 TH/s)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 93% better power draw (215 vs 3,300 W)
- Goldshell CK6 16% better efficiency (205 vs 171 J/TH)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 76% better weight (2,000 vs 8,500 kg)
- Goldshell CK6 1435% more heat output (734 vs 11,260 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 41% more home mining score (31.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell CK-BOX | Metric | Goldshell CK6 |
|---|---|---|
| $190 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $799 |
| -$0.48 | Daily net profit | -$7.22 |
| -$365 | Net after 1 year | -$3,436 |
| -$539 | Net after 2 years | -$6,073 |
| -$714 | Net after 3 years | -$8,710 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell CK-BOXScore: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell CK6171.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell CK-BOX vs Goldshell CK6: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell CK-BOX is more profitable at $-0.48/day compared to $-7.22/day for the Goldshell CK6. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell CK-BOX or Goldshell CK6?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Goldshell CK-BOX vs Goldshell CK6: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell CK-BOX scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell CK6). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell CK-BOX vs Goldshell CK6: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell CK-BOX runs at 204.8 J/TH while the Goldshell CK6 runs at 171.0 J/TH — a difference of 33.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 16% better efficiency (205 vs 171 J/TH).