Bitmain CK6-SE vs Goldshell CK-LITE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain CK6-SE | Specification | Goldshell CK-LITE |
|---|---|---|
| 17.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 6.3 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Power Consumption | 1,200 W |
| 194.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 190.5 J/TH |
| 80 dB | Noise Level | 65 dB |
| 11.5 kg | Weight | 7.5 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,094 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 52/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithm | Eaglesong |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain CK6-SE
Goldshell CK-LITE
Based on BTC price of $78,257 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell CK-LITE comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 64% better power draw (3,300 vs 1,200 W). That said, the Bitmain CK6-SE isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain CK6-SE and Goldshell CK-LITE sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain CK6-SE 170% more hashrate (17.0 vs 6.3 TH/s)
- Goldshell CK-LITE 64% better power draw (3,300 vs 1,200 W)
- Goldshell CK-LITE 2% better efficiency (194 vs 190 J/TH)
- Goldshell CK-LITE 19% better noise (80.0 vs 65.0 dB)
- Goldshell CK-LITE 35% better weight (11.5 vs 7.5 kg)
- Bitmain CK6-SE 175% more heat output (11,260 vs 4,094 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell CK-LITE 79% more home mining score (29.0 vs 52.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain CK6-SE | Metric | Goldshell CK-LITE |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $599 |
| -$7.31 | Daily net profit | -$2.65 |
| -$2,667 | Net after 1 year | -$1,567 |
| -$5,335 | Net after 2 years | -$2,536 |
| -$8,002 | Net after 3 years | -$3,504 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell CK-LITEScore: 52/100. 65 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell CK-LITE190.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain CK6-SE vs Goldshell CK-LITE: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell CK-LITE is more profitable at $-2.65/day compared to $-7.31/day for the Bitmain CK6-SE. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain CK6-SE vs Goldshell CK-LITE: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell CK-LITE is quieter at 65 dB compared to the Bitmain CK6-SE at 80 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain CK6-SE vs Goldshell CK-LITE: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell CK-LITE scores 52/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Bitmain CK6-SE). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain CK6-SE vs Goldshell CK-LITE: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain CK6-SE runs at 194.1 J/TH while the Goldshell CK-LITE runs at 190.5 J/TH — a difference of 3.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 2% better efficiency (194 vs 190 J/TH).