Goldshell CK6 vs Goldshell CK-BOX
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell CK6 | Specification | Goldshell CK-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| 19.3 TH/s | Hashrate | 1.1 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Power Consumption | 215 W |
| 171.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 204.8 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 45 dB |
| 8,500.0 kg | Weight | 2.0 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 734 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 59/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithm | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell CK6
Goldshell CK-BOX
Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Goldshell CK6 wins on 3 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 1738% more hashrate (19.3 vs 1.1 TH/s) in the Goldshell CK6's favour. The Goldshell CK-BOX holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell CK6 and Goldshell CK-BOX sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell CK6 1738% more hashrate (19.3 vs 1.1 TH/s)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 93% better power draw (3,300 vs 215 W)
- Goldshell CK6 16% better efficiency (171 vs 205 J/TH)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 100% better weight (8,500.0 vs 2.0 kg)
- Goldshell CK6 1435% more heat output (11,260 vs 734 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 168% more home mining score (22.0 vs 59.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell CK6 | Metric | Goldshell CK-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| $799 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $399 |
| -$7.23 | Daily net profit | -$0.48 |
| -$3,436 | Net after 1 year | -$574 |
| -$6,073 | Net after 2 years | -$748 |
| -$8,711 | Net after 3 years | -$923 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell CK-BOXScore: 59/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell CK6171.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell CK6 or Goldshell CK-BOX more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell CK-BOX is more profitable at $-0.48/day compared to $-7.23/day for the Goldshell CK6. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell CK6 or the Goldshell CK-BOX better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell CK-BOX is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Goldshell CK6 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell CK6 vs Goldshell CK-BOX: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell CK-BOX scores 59/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell CK6). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell CK6 and Goldshell CK-BOX on J/TH?
The Goldshell CK6 runs at 171.0 J/TH while the Goldshell CK-BOX runs at 204.8 J/TH — a difference of 33.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 16% better efficiency (171 vs 205 J/TH).