Goldshell CK6 vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell CK6 | Specification | iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 19.3 TH/s | Hashrate | 1.3 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Power Consumption | 185 W |
| 171.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 142.3 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 8,500.0 kg | Weight | 2.2 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 631 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 33/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithm | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell CK6
iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th), which leads on 3 of 4 weighted factors (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score). Its biggest concrete edge: 94% better power draw (3,300 vs 185 W). The Goldshell CK6 claws back ground on hashrate. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell CK6 and iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell CK6 1385% more hashrate (19.3 vs 1.3 TH/s)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) 94% better power draw (3,300 vs 185 W)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) 17% better efficiency (171 vs 142 J/TH)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) 100% better weight (8,500.0 vs 2.2 kg)
- Goldshell CK6 1684% more heat output (11,260 vs 631 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) 50% more home mining score (22.0 vs 33.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell CK6 | Metric | iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $799 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$7.23 | Daily net profit | -$0.40 |
| -$3,436 | Net after 1 year | -$145 |
| -$6,073 | Net after 2 years | -$290 |
| -$8,711 | Net after 3 years | -$435 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)Score: 33/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)142.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell CK6 or iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) is more profitable at $-0.40/day compared to $-7.23/day for the Goldshell CK6. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell CK6 or the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Goldshell CK6 vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th): which fits a residential setup better?
The iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) scores 33/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell CK6). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell CK6 vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell CK6 runs at 171.0 J/TH while the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) runs at 142.3 J/TH — a difference of 28.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 17% better efficiency (171 vs 142 J/TH).