Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Fluminer L1

Fluminer L1

Hashrate 5.3 GH/s Power 1,200 W Efficiency 226,415.1 J/TH
VS
Goldshell X5S

Goldshell X5S

Hashrate 1.4 GH/s Power 1,850 W Efficiency 1,360,294.1 J/TH

Fluminer L1 vs Goldshell X5S

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Fluminer L1 Specification Goldshell X5S
5.3 GH/s Hashrate 1.4 GH/s
1,200 W Power Consumption 1,850 W
226,415.1 J/TH Efficiency 1,360,294.1 J/TH
40 dB Noise Level
10.0 kg Weight 5,200.0 kg
4,094 BTU/hr BTU Output 6,312 BTU/hr
66/100 Home Mining Score 28/100
Release Year
Scrypt Algorithm Scrypt
FluMiner Manufacturer Goldshell

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Fluminer L1

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$2.88
Daily Profit -$2.88
Monthly -$86.39
Yearly -$1,051.13

Goldshell X5S

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$4.44
Daily Profit -$4.44
Monthly -$133.20
Yearly -$1,620.58

Based on BTC price of $78,186 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Fluminer L1 comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 83% better efficiency (226,415 vs 1,360,294 J/TH). Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Fluminer L1 — wins on 5 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Fluminer L1 and Goldshell X5S actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Fluminer L1 290% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Fluminer L1 35% better power draw (1,200 vs 1,850 W)
  • Fluminer L1 83% better efficiency (226,415 vs 1,360,294 J/TH)
  • Fluminer L1 100% better weight (10.0 vs 5,200.0 kg)
  • Goldshell X5S 54% more heat output (4,094 vs 6,312 BTU/hr)
  • Fluminer L1 136% more home mining score (66.0 vs 28.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Fluminer L1 Metric Goldshell X5S
$1,452 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$2.88 Daily net profit -$4.44
-$2,503 Net after 1 year -$1,621
-$3,554 Net after 2 years -$3,241
-$4,605 Net after 3 years -$4,862
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Fluminer L1

Score: 66/100. 40 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Fluminer L1

226,415.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Fluminer L1 vs Goldshell X5S: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Fluminer L1 is more profitable at $-2.88/day compared to $-4.44/day for the Goldshell X5S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Fluminer L1 or the Goldshell X5S better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The Fluminer L1 is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Goldshell X5S at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Fluminer L1 or Goldshell X5S?

The Fluminer L1 scores 66/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Goldshell X5S). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Fluminer L1 vs Goldshell X5S: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Fluminer L1 runs at 226,415.1 J/TH while the Goldshell X5S runs at 1,360,294.1 J/TH — a difference of 1,133,879.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 83% better efficiency (226,415 vs 1,360,294 J/TH).