Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Goldshell HS5

Goldshell HS5

Hashrate 2.7 TH/s Power 2,650 W Efficiency 981.5 J/TH
VS
Goldshell SC Lite

Goldshell SC Lite

Hashrate 4.0 TH/s Power 950 W Efficiency 237.5 J/TH

Goldshell HS5 vs Goldshell SC Lite

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Goldshell HS5 Specification Goldshell SC Lite
2.7 TH/s Hashrate 4.0 TH/s
2,650 W Power Consumption 950 W
981.5 J/TH Efficiency 237.5 J/TH
Noise Level
8,500.0 kg Weight 9.5 kg
9,042 BTU/hr BTU Output 3,241 BTU/hr
22/100 Home Mining Score 31/100
Release Year
Blake2b-sia Algorithm Blake2b-sia
Goldshell Manufacturer Goldshell

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Goldshell HS5

Daily Revenue 0.00000124 BTC $0.10
Daily Electricity -$6.36
Daily Profit -$6.26
Monthly -$187.93
Yearly -$2,286.48

Goldshell SC Lite

Daily Revenue 0.00000184 BTC $0.14
Daily Electricity -$2.28
Daily Profit -$2.14
Monthly -$64.15
Yearly -$780.47

Based on BTC price of $76,989 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Goldshell SC Lite wins on 5 of 5 factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 76% better efficiency (981 vs 238 J/TH). Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Goldshell SC Lite — wins on 5 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

The Goldshell HS5 and Goldshell SC Lite diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Goldshell SC Lite 48% more hashrate (2.7 vs 4.0 TH/s)
  • Goldshell SC Lite 64% better power draw (2,650 vs 950 W)
  • Goldshell SC Lite 76% better efficiency (981 vs 238 J/TH)
  • Goldshell SC Lite 100% better weight (8,500.0 vs 9.5 kg)
  • Goldshell HS5 179% more heat output (9,042 vs 3,241 BTU/hr)
  • Goldshell SC Lite 41% more home mining score (22.0 vs 31.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Goldshell HS5 Metric Goldshell SC Lite
$949 Upfront cost (MSRP) $130
-$6.26 Daily net profit -$2.14
-$3,235 Net after 1 year -$910
-$5,522 Net after 2 years -$1,691
-$7,808 Net after 3 years -$2,471
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Goldshell SC Lite

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Goldshell SC Lite

237.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Goldshell HS5 or the Goldshell SC Lite?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell SC Lite is more profitable at $-2.14/day compared to $-6.26/day for the Goldshell HS5. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Goldshell HS5 vs Goldshell SC Lite: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell HS5 or Goldshell SC Lite?

The Goldshell SC Lite scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell HS5). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Goldshell HS5 vs Goldshell SC Lite: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Goldshell HS5 runs at 981.5 J/TH while the Goldshell SC Lite runs at 237.5 J/TH — a difference of 744.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 76% better efficiency (981 vs 238 J/TH).