Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Goldshell HS5

Goldshell HS5

Hashrate 2.7 TH/s Power 2,650 W Efficiency 981.5 J/TH
VS
Goldshell SC5 Pro II

Goldshell SC5 Pro II

Hashrate 14.0 TH/s Power 3,300 W Efficiency 235.7 J/TH

Goldshell HS5 vs Goldshell SC5 Pro II

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Goldshell HS5 Specification Goldshell SC5 Pro II
2.7 TH/s Hashrate 14.0 TH/s
2,650 W Power Consumption 3,300 W
981.5 J/TH Efficiency 235.7 J/TH
Noise Level
8,500.0 kg Weight 11.5 kg
9,042 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,260 BTU/hr
22/100 Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
Blake2b-sia Algorithm Blake2b-sia
Goldshell Manufacturer Goldshell

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Goldshell HS5

Daily Revenue 0.00000124 BTC $0.10
Daily Electricity -$6.36
Daily Profit -$6.26
Monthly -$187.93
Yearly -$2,286.48

Goldshell SC5 Pro II

Daily Revenue 0.00000644 BTC $0.50
Daily Electricity -$7.92
Daily Profit -$7.42
Monthly -$222.72
Yearly -$2,709.76

Based on BTC price of $76,989 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell SC5 Pro II edges it: 3 of 4 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 419% more hashrate (2.7 vs 14.0 TH/s). The Goldshell HS5 claws back ground on power consumption. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Goldshell SC5 Pro II — wins on 3 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell HS5 and Goldshell SC5 Pro II sit on each measurable spec:

  • Goldshell SC5 Pro II 419% more hashrate (2.7 vs 14.0 TH/s)
  • Goldshell HS5 20% better power draw (2,650 vs 3,300 W)
  • Goldshell SC5 Pro II 76% better efficiency (981 vs 236 J/TH)
  • Goldshell SC5 Pro II 100% better weight (8,500.0 vs 11.5 kg)
  • Goldshell SC5 Pro II 25% more heat output (9,042 vs 11,260 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Goldshell HS5 Metric Goldshell SC5 Pro II
$949 Upfront cost (MSRP) $630
-$6.26 Daily net profit -$7.42
-$3,235 Net after 1 year -$3,340
-$5,522 Net after 2 years -$6,050
-$7,808 Net after 3 years -$8,759
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Goldshell SC5 Pro II

235.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Goldshell HS5 vs Goldshell SC5 Pro II: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell HS5 is more profitable at $-6.26/day compared to $-7.42/day for the Goldshell SC5 Pro II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Goldshell HS5 or Goldshell SC5 Pro II?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell HS5 or the Goldshell SC5 Pro II?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

Goldshell HS5 vs Goldshell SC5 Pro II: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Goldshell HS5 runs at 981.5 J/TH while the Goldshell SC5 Pro II runs at 235.7 J/TH — a difference of 745.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 76% better efficiency (981 vs 236 J/TH).