Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Goldshell HS6 SE

Goldshell HS6 SE

Hashrate 3.7 TH/s Power 3,400 W Efficiency 918.9 J/TH
VS
Hummer Miner Mars H1

Hummer Miner Mars H1

Hashrate 88.0 GH/s Power 2,800 W Efficiency 31,818.2 J/TH

Goldshell HS6 SE vs Hummer Miner Mars H1

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Goldshell HS6 SE Specification Hummer Miner Mars H1
3.7 TH/s Hashrate 88.0 GH/s
3,400 W Power Consumption 2,800 W
918.9 J/TH Efficiency 31,818.2 J/TH
Noise Level
Weight 21,000.0 kg
11,601 BTU/hr BTU Output 9,554 BTU/hr
22/100 Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
Blake2b+sha3 Algorithm Blake2b+sha3
Goldshell Manufacturer Hummer Miner

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Goldshell HS6 SE

Daily Revenue 0.00000170 BTC $0.13
Daily Electricity -$8.16
Daily Profit -$8.03
Monthly -$240.87
Yearly -$2,930.57

Hummer Miner Mars H1

Daily Revenue 0.00000004 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$6.72
Daily Profit -$6.72
Monthly -$201.51
Yearly -$2,451.66

Based on BTC price of $76,967 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell HS6 SE comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 3 (efficiency, hashrate). The standout gap is 4105% more hashrate (3.7 vs 0.1 TH/s) in the Goldshell HS6 SE's favour. The Hummer Miner Mars H1 claws back ground on power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Goldshell HS6 SE — wins on 2 of 3 factors

Spec Deltas

The Goldshell HS6 SE and Hummer Miner Mars H1 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Goldshell HS6 SE 4105% more hashrate (3.7 vs 0.1 TH/s)
  • Hummer Miner Mars H1 18% better power draw (3,400 vs 2,800 W)
  • Goldshell HS6 SE 97% better efficiency (919 vs 31,818 J/TH)
  • Goldshell HS6 SE 21% more heat output (11,601 vs 9,554 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Goldshell HS6 SE Metric Hummer Miner Mars H1
$1,060 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$8.03 Daily net profit -$6.72
-$3,991 Net after 1 year -$2,452
-$6,921 Net after 2 years -$4,903
-$9,852 Net after 3 years -$7,355
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Goldshell HS6 SE

918.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Goldshell HS6 SE or Hummer Miner Mars H1 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Hummer Miner Mars H1 is more profitable at $-6.72/day compared to $-8.03/day for the Goldshell HS6 SE. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Goldshell HS6 SE or the Hummer Miner Mars H1 better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Goldshell HS6 SE vs Hummer Miner Mars H1: which fits a residential setup better?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell HS6 SE and Hummer Miner Mars H1?

The Goldshell HS6 SE runs at 918.9 J/TH while the Hummer Miner Mars H1 runs at 31,818.2 J/TH — a difference of 30,899.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 97% better efficiency (919 vs 31,818 J/TH).