Goldshell HS BOX II vs Hummer Miner Mars H1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell HS BOX II | Specification | Hummer Miner Mars H1 |
|---|---|---|
| 460.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 88.0 GH/s |
| 400 W | Power Consumption | 2,800 W |
| 869.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 31,818.2 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 2.0 kg | Weight | 21,000.0 kg |
| 1,365 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 9,554 BTU/hr |
| 34/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2b+sha3 | Algorithm | Blake2b+sha3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Hummer Miner |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell HS BOX II
Hummer Miner Mars H1
Based on BTC price of $76,967 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Goldshell HS BOX II wins on 4 of 4 factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score). Its biggest concrete edge: 97% better efficiency (870 vs 31,818 J/TH). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell HS BOX II and Hummer Miner Mars H1 sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell HS BOX II 423% more hashrate (0.5 vs 0.1 TH/s)
- Goldshell HS BOX II 86% better power draw (400 vs 2,800 W)
- Goldshell HS BOX II 97% better efficiency (870 vs 31,818 J/TH)
- Goldshell HS BOX II 100% better weight (2.0 vs 21,000.0 kg)
- Hummer Miner Mars H1 600% more heat output (1,365 vs 9,554 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell HS BOX II 55% more home mining score (34.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell HS BOX II | Metric | Hummer Miner Mars H1 |
|---|---|---|
| $325 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$0.94 | Daily net profit | -$6.72 |
| -$670 | Net after 1 year | -$2,452 |
| -$1,014 | Net after 2 years | -$4,903 |
| -$1,359 | Net after 3 years | -$7,355 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell HS BOX IIScore: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell HS BOX II869.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell HS BOX II or Hummer Miner Mars H1 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell HS BOX II is more profitable at $-0.94/day compared to $-6.72/day for the Hummer Miner Mars H1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell HS BOX II or Hummer Miner Mars H1?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell HS BOX II or the Hummer Miner Mars H1?
The Goldshell HS BOX II scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Hummer Miner Mars H1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell HS BOX II vs Hummer Miner Mars H1: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell HS BOX II runs at 869.6 J/TH while the Hummer Miner Mars H1 runs at 31,818.2 J/TH — a difference of 30,948.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 97% better efficiency (870 vs 31,818 J/TH).