Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Goldshell HS6

Goldshell HS6

Hashrate 4.3 TH/s Power 3,250 W Efficiency 755.8 J/TH
VS
Hummer Miner Mars H1

Hummer Miner Mars H1

Hashrate 88.0 GH/s Power 2,800 W Efficiency 31,818.2 J/TH

Goldshell HS6 vs Hummer Miner Mars H1

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Goldshell HS6 Specification Hummer Miner Mars H1
4.3 TH/s Hashrate 88.0 GH/s
3,250 W Power Consumption 2,800 W
755.8 J/TH Efficiency 31,818.2 J/TH
Noise Level
8.5 kg Weight 21,000.0 kg
11,089 BTU/hr BTU Output 9,554 BTU/hr
22/100 Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
Blake2b+sha3 Algorithm Blake2b+sha3
Goldshell Manufacturer Hummer Miner

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Goldshell HS6

Daily Revenue 0.00000198 BTC $0.15
Daily Electricity -$7.80
Daily Profit -$7.65
Monthly -$229.43
Yearly -$2,791.39

Hummer Miner Mars H1

Daily Revenue 0.00000004 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$6.72
Daily Profit -$6.72
Monthly -$201.51
Yearly -$2,451.66

Based on BTC price of $76,989 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell HS6 edges it: 2 of 3 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 4786% more hashrate (4.3 vs 0.1 TH/s). That said, the Hummer Miner Mars H1 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Goldshell HS6 — wins on 2 of 3 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Goldshell HS6 and Hummer Miner Mars H1 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Goldshell HS6 4786% more hashrate (4.3 vs 0.1 TH/s)
  • Hummer Miner Mars H1 14% better power draw (3,250 vs 2,800 W)
  • Goldshell HS6 98% better efficiency (756 vs 31,818 J/TH)
  • Goldshell HS6 100% better weight (8.5 vs 21,000.0 kg)
  • Goldshell HS6 16% more heat output (11,089 vs 9,554 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Goldshell HS6 Metric Hummer Miner Mars H1
$3,100 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$7.65 Daily net profit -$6.72
-$5,891 Net after 1 year -$2,452
-$8,683 Net after 2 years -$4,903
-$11,474 Net after 3 years -$7,355
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Goldshell HS6

755.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Goldshell HS6 or Hummer Miner Mars H1 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Hummer Miner Mars H1 is more profitable at $-6.72/day compared to $-7.65/day for the Goldshell HS6. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Goldshell HS6 or Hummer Miner Mars H1?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell HS6 or Hummer Miner Mars H1?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell HS6 and Hummer Miner Mars H1?

The Goldshell HS6 runs at 755.8 J/TH while the Hummer Miner Mars H1 runs at 31,818.2 J/TH — a difference of 31,062.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 98% better efficiency (756 vs 31,818 J/TH).