IceRiver KS0 vs Iceriver KS3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS0 | Specification | Iceriver KS3 |
|---|---|---|
| 100.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 8.0 TH/s |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 3,200 W |
| 650.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 400.0 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 2.5 kg | Weight | 13.5 kg |
| 222 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,918 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS0
Iceriver KS3
Based on BTC price of $77,015 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Iceriver KS3 comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 7900% more hashrate (0.1 vs 8.0 TH/s). The IceRiver KS0 claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the IceRiver KS0 and Iceriver KS3 sit on each measurable spec:
- Iceriver KS3 7900% more hashrate (0.1 vs 8.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS0 98% better power draw (65.0 vs 3,200.0 W)
- Iceriver KS3 38% better efficiency (650 vs 400 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS0 53% better noise (35.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- IceRiver KS0 81% better weight (2.5 vs 13.5 kg)
- Iceriver KS3 4823% more heat output (222 vs 10,918 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS0 97% more home mining score (71.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| IceRiver KS0 | Metric | Iceriver KS3 |
|---|---|---|
| $99 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $730 |
| -$0.15 | Daily net profit | -$7.40 |
| -$155 | Net after 1 year | -$3,430 |
| -$210 | Net after 2 years | -$6,129 |
| -$266 | Net after 3 years | -$8,829 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS0Score: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KS3400.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the IceRiver KS0 or the Iceriver KS3?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS0 is more profitable at $-0.15/day compared to $-7.40/day for the Iceriver KS3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the IceRiver KS0 or the Iceriver KS3 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The IceRiver KS0 is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Iceriver KS3 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
IceRiver KS0 vs Iceriver KS3: which fits a residential setup better?
The IceRiver KS0 scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver KS3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between IceRiver KS0 and Iceriver KS3?
The IceRiver KS0 runs at 650.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KS3 runs at 400.0 J/TH — a difference of 250.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 38% better efficiency (650 vs 400 J/TH).