Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Innosilicon A11 Pro

Innosilicon A11 Pro

Hashrate 2,000.0 MH/s Power 2,500 W Efficiency 1,250,000.0 J/TH
VS
Jasminer X16-QE

Jasminer X16-QE

Hashrate 1.8 GH/s Power 550 W Efficiency 314,285.7 J/TH

Innosilicon A11 Pro vs Jasminer X16-QE

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Innosilicon A11 Pro Specification Jasminer X16-QE
2,000.0 MH/s Hashrate 1.8 GH/s
2,500 W Power Consumption 550 W
1,250,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 314,285.7 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 40 dB
22.0 kg Weight 10.0 kg
8,530 BTU/hr BTU Output 1,877 BTU/hr
40/100 Home Mining Score 65/100
Release Year
EtHash Algorithm EtHash
Innosilicon Manufacturer Jasminer

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Innosilicon A11 Pro

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$6.00
Daily Profit -$6.00
Monthly -$180.00
Yearly -$2,189.97

Jasminer X16-QE

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.32
Daily Profit -$1.32
Monthly -$39.60
Yearly -$481.78

Based on BTC price of $78,209 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Jasminer X16-QE wins on 5 of 5 factors (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 78% better power draw (2,500 vs 550 W). Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Jasminer X16-QE — wins on 5 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

The Innosilicon A11 Pro and Jasminer X16-QE diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Innosilicon A11 Pro 14% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Jasminer X16-QE 78% better power draw (2,500 vs 550 W)
  • Jasminer X16-QE 75% better efficiency (1,250,000 vs 314,286 J/TH)
  • Jasminer X16-QE 47% better noise (75.0 vs 40.0 dB)
  • Jasminer X16-QE 55% better weight (22.0 vs 10.0 kg)
  • Innosilicon A11 Pro 355% more heat output (8,530 vs 1,877 BTU/hr)
  • Jasminer X16-QE 63% more home mining score (40.0 vs 65.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Innosilicon A11 Pro Metric Jasminer X16-QE
$4,000 Upfront cost (MSRP) $469
-$6.00 Daily net profit -$1.32
-$6,190 Net after 1 year -$951
-$8,380 Net after 2 years -$1,433
-$10,570 Net after 3 years -$1,914
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Jasminer X16-QE

Score: 65/100. 40 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Jasminer X16-QE

314,285.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Innosilicon A11 Pro or Jasminer X16-QE more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Jasminer X16-QE is more profitable at $-1.32/day compared to $-6.00/day for the Innosilicon A11 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Innosilicon A11 Pro vs Jasminer X16-QE: which runs at a lower noise level?

The Jasminer X16-QE is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Innosilicon A11 Pro at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Innosilicon A11 Pro vs Jasminer X16-QE: which fits a residential setup better?

The Jasminer X16-QE scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 40/100 for the Innosilicon A11 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Innosilicon A11 Pro vs Jasminer X16-QE: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Innosilicon A11 Pro runs at 1,250,000.0 J/TH while the Jasminer X16-QE runs at 314,285.7 J/TH — a difference of 935,714.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 75% better efficiency (1,250,000 vs 314,286 J/TH).