Jasminer X16-Q vs iPollo X1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Jasminer X16-Q | Specification | iPollo X1 |
|---|---|---|
| 1,950.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 300.0 MH/s |
| 620 W | Power Consumption | 240 W |
| 317,948.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 800,000.0 J/TH |
| 40 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 10.0 kg | Weight | 1.5 kg |
| 2,115 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 819 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | EtHash |
| Jasminer | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
Jasminer X16-Q
iPollo X1
Based on BTC price of $78,165 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Jasminer X16-Q wins on 4 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 550% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The iPollo X1 claws back ground on power consumption and price-performance. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Jasminer X16-Q and iPollo X1 sit on each measurable spec:
- Jasminer X16-Q 550% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo X1 61% better power draw (620 vs 240 W)
- Jasminer X16-Q 60% better efficiency (317,949 vs 800,000 J/TH)
- iPollo X1 86% better weight (10.0 vs 1.5 kg)
- Jasminer X16-Q 158% more heat output (2,115 vs 819 BTU/hr)
- Jasminer X16-Q 110% more home mining score (65.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Jasminer X16-Q | Metric | iPollo X1 |
|---|---|---|
| $3,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $444 |
| -$1.49 | Daily net profit | -$0.58 |
| -$4,043 | Net after 1 year | -$654 |
| -$4,586 | Net after 2 years | -$864 |
| -$5,129 | Net after 3 years | -$1,075 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Jasminer X16-QScore: 65/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X16-Q317,948.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Jasminer X16-Q vs iPollo X1: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo X1 is more profitable at $-0.58/day compared to $-1.49/day for the Jasminer X16-Q. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Jasminer X16-Q or iPollo X1?
The Jasminer X16-Q is quieter at 40 dB compared to the iPollo X1 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Jasminer X16-Q or iPollo X1?
The Jasminer X16-Q scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the iPollo X1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Jasminer X16-Q vs iPollo X1: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Jasminer X16-Q runs at 317,948.7 J/TH while the iPollo X1 runs at 800,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 482,051.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 60% better efficiency (317,949 vs 800,000 J/TH).