Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Nerdminer

Nerdminer

Hashrate 50.0 KH/s Power 1 W Efficiency 20,000,000.0 J/TH
VS
NerdQAxe++

NerdQAxe++

Hashrate 4.0 TH/s Power 120 W Efficiency 30.0 J/TH

Nerdminer vs NerdQAxe++

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Nerdminer Specification NerdQAxe++
50.0 KH/s Hashrate 4.0 TH/s
1 W Power Consumption 120 W
20,000,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 30.0 J/TH
Noise Level 42 dB
0.1 kg Weight 0.5 kg
3 BTU/hr BTU Output 409 BTU/hr
35/100 Home Mining Score 58/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
D-Central Manufacturer D-Central

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Nerdminer

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.00
Daily Profit -$0.00
Monthly -$0.07
Yearly -$0.88

NerdQAxe++

Daily Revenue 0.00000184 BTC $0.14
Daily Electricity -$0.29
Daily Profit -$0.14
Monthly -$4.34
Yearly -$52.75

Based on BTC price of $77,947 and current network difficulty as of May 21, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the NerdQAxe++ comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 7999999900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 4.0 TH/s). The Nerdminer claws back ground on power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: NerdQAxe++ — wins on 5 of 6 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Nerdminer and NerdQAxe++ sit on each measurable spec:

  • NerdQAxe++ 7999999900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 4.0 TH/s)
  • Nerdminer 99% better power draw (1.0 vs 120.0 W)
  • NerdQAxe++ 100% better efficiency (20,000,000.0 vs 30.0 J/TH)
  • Nerdminer 90% better weight (0.1 vs 0.5 kg)
  • NerdQAxe++ 11941% more heat output (3.4 vs 409.4 BTU/hr)
  • NerdQAxe++ 66% more home mining score (35.0 vs 58.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Nerdminer Metric NerdQAxe++
$29 Upfront cost (MSRP) $349
-$0.00 Daily net profit -$0.14
-$30 Net after 1 year -$402
-$31 Net after 2 years -$454
-$32 Net after 3 years -$507
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

NerdQAxe++

Score: 58/100. 42 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

NerdQAxe++

30.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Nerdminer or the NerdQAxe++?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Nerdminer is more profitable at $0.00/day compared to $-0.14/day for the NerdQAxe++. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Nerdminer vs NerdQAxe++: which runs at a lower noise level?

The NerdQAxe++ is quieter at 42 dB compared to the Nerdminer at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Nerdminer vs NerdQAxe++: which fits a residential setup better?

The NerdQAxe++ scores 58/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 35/100 for the Nerdminer). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Nerdminer and NerdQAxe++ on J/TH?

The Nerdminer runs at 20,000,000.0 J/TH while the NerdQAxe++ runs at 30.0 J/TH — a difference of 19,999,970.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (20,000,000.0 vs 30.0 J/TH).