Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Bitmain S19k Pro

Bitmain S19k Pro

Hashrate 120.0 TH/s Power 2,760 W Efficiency 23.0 J/TH
VS
StrongU STU-U8

StrongU STU-U8

Hashrate 46.0 TH/s Power 2,100 W Efficiency 45.7 J/TH

Bitmain S19k Pro vs StrongU STU-U8

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bitmain S19k Pro Specification StrongU STU-U8
120.0 TH/s Hashrate 46.0 TH/s
2,760 W Power Consumption 2,100 W
23.0 J/TH Efficiency 45.7 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level
14.5 kg Weight 8,200.0 kg
9,417 BTU/hr BTU Output 7,165 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 26/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer StrongU

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bitmain S19k Pro

Daily Revenue 0.00005522 BTC $4.30
Daily Electricity -$6.62
Daily Profit -$2.32
Monthly -$69.63
Yearly -$847.20

StrongU STU-U8

Daily Revenue 0.00002117 BTC $1.65
Daily Electricity -$5.04
Daily Profit -$3.39
Monthly -$101.72
Yearly -$1,237.55

Based on BTC price of $77,920 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain S19k Pro comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 161% more hashrate (120.0 vs 46.0 TH/s). That said, the StrongU STU-U8 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Bitmain S19k Pro — wins on 4 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain S19k Pro and StrongU STU-U8 sit on each measurable spec:

  • Bitmain S19k Pro 161% more hashrate (120.0 vs 46.0 TH/s)
  • StrongU STU-U8 24% better power draw (2,760 vs 2,100 W)
  • Bitmain S19k Pro 50% better efficiency (23.0 vs 45.7 J/TH)
  • Bitmain S19k Pro 100% better weight (14.5 vs 8,200.0 kg)
  • Bitmain S19k Pro 31% more heat output (9,417 vs 7,165 BTU/hr)
  • Bitmain S19k Pro 38% more home mining score (36.0 vs 26.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Bitmain S19k Pro Metric StrongU STU-U8
$313 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$2.32 Daily net profit -$3.39
-$1,160 Net after 1 year -$1,238
-$2,008 Net after 2 years -$2,475
-$2,855 Net after 3 years -$3,713
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Bitmain S19k Pro

Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Bitmain S19k Pro

23.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Bitmain S19k Pro or StrongU STU-U8 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain S19k Pro is more profitable at $-2.32/day compared to $-3.39/day for the StrongU STU-U8. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Bitmain S19k Pro or StrongU STU-U8?

The Bitmain S19k Pro is quieter at 75 dB compared to the StrongU STU-U8 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain S19k Pro or StrongU STU-U8?

The Bitmain S19k Pro scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the StrongU STU-U8). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain S19k Pro and StrongU STU-U8?

The Bitmain S19k Pro runs at 23.0 J/TH while the StrongU STU-U8 runs at 45.7 J/TH — a difference of 22.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 50% better efficiency (23.0 vs 45.7 J/TH).