Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Innosilicon T3 50T

Innosilicon T3 50T

Hashrate 50.0 TH/s Power 3,100 W Efficiency 62.0 J/TH
VS
Whatsminer M50S

Whatsminer M50S

Hashrate 126.0 TH/s Power 3,276 W Efficiency 26.0 J/TH

Innosilicon T3 50T vs Whatsminer M50S

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Innosilicon T3 50T Specification Whatsminer M50S
50.0 TH/s Hashrate 126.0 TH/s
3,100 W Power Consumption 3,276 W
62.0 J/TH Efficiency 26.0 J/TH
Noise Level 75 dB
10,000.0 kg Weight 12.8 kg
10,577 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,178 BTU/hr
22/100 Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Innosilicon Manufacturer MicroBT

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Innosilicon T3 50T

Daily Revenue 0.00002301 BTC $1.79
Daily Electricity -$7.44
Daily Profit -$5.65
Monthly -$169.38
Yearly -$2,060.85

Whatsminer M50S

Daily Revenue 0.00005798 BTC $4.52
Daily Electricity -$7.86
Daily Profit -$3.34
Monthly -$100.26
Yearly -$1,219.80

Based on BTC price of $77,962 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Whatsminer M50S edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 152% more hashrate (50.0 vs 126.0 TH/s). The Innosilicon T3 50T holds the edge in power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Whatsminer M50S — wins on 4 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Innosilicon T3 50T and Whatsminer M50S actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Whatsminer M50S 152% more hashrate (50.0 vs 126.0 TH/s)
  • Innosilicon T3 50T 5% better power draw (3,100 vs 3,276 W)
  • Whatsminer M50S 58% better efficiency (62.0 vs 26.0 J/TH)
  • Whatsminer M50S 100% better weight (10,000.0 vs 12.8 kg)
  • Whatsminer M50S 6% more heat output (10,577 vs 11,178 BTU/hr)
  • Whatsminer M50S 64% more home mining score (22.0 vs 36.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Innosilicon T3 50T Metric Whatsminer M50S
Upfront cost (MSRP) $3,200
-$5.65 Daily net profit -$3.34
-$2,061 Net after 1 year -$4,420
-$4,122 Net after 2 years -$5,640
-$6,183 Net after 3 years -$6,859
Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Whatsminer M50S

Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Whatsminer M50S

26.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Innosilicon T3 50T or the Whatsminer M50S?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M50S is more profitable at $-3.34/day compared to $-5.65/day for the Innosilicon T3 50T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Innosilicon T3 50T or the Whatsminer M50S better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The Whatsminer M50S is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Innosilicon T3 50T at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Innosilicon T3 50T or Whatsminer M50S?

The Whatsminer M50S scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Innosilicon T3 50T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Innosilicon T3 50T vs Whatsminer M50S: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Innosilicon T3 50T runs at 62.0 J/TH while the Whatsminer M50S runs at 26.0 J/TH — a difference of 36.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 58% better efficiency (62.0 vs 26.0 J/TH).