Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Whatsminer M50

Whatsminer M50

Hashrate 114.0 TH/s Power 3,306 W Efficiency 29.0 J/TH
VS
Whatsminer M50S

Whatsminer M50S

Hashrate 126.0 TH/s Power 3,276 W Efficiency 26.0 J/TH

Whatsminer M50 vs Whatsminer M50S

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Whatsminer M50 Specification Whatsminer M50S
114.0 TH/s Hashrate 126.0 TH/s
3,306 W Power Consumption 3,276 W
29.0 J/TH Efficiency 26.0 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 75 dB
12.5 kg Weight 12.8 kg
11,280 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,178 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
MicroBT Manufacturer MicroBT

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Whatsminer M50

Daily Revenue 0.00005246 BTC $4.04
Daily Electricity -$7.93
Daily Profit -$3.90
Monthly -$116.92
Yearly -$1,422.56

Whatsminer M50S

Daily Revenue 0.00005798 BTC $4.46
Daily Electricity -$7.86
Daily Profit -$3.40
Monthly -$102.01
Yearly -$1,241.18

Based on BTC price of $76,952 and current network difficulty as of May 19, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Whatsminer M50S edges it: 3 of 4 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption). The standout gap is 10% better efficiency (29.0 vs 26.0 J/TH) in the Whatsminer M50S's favour. That said, the Whatsminer M50 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins price-performance. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Whatsminer M50S — wins on 3 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Whatsminer M50 and Whatsminer M50S sit on each measurable spec:

  • Whatsminer M50S 11% more hashrate (114 vs 126 TH/s)
  • Whatsminer M50S 1% better power draw (3,306 vs 3,276 W)
  • Whatsminer M50S 10% better efficiency (29.0 vs 26.0 J/TH)
  • Whatsminer M50 2% better weight (12.5 vs 12.8 kg)
  • Whatsminer M50 1% more heat output (11,280 vs 11,178 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Whatsminer M50 Metric Whatsminer M50S
$2,600 Upfront cost (MSRP) $3,200
-$3.90 Daily net profit -$3.40
-$4,023 Net after 1 year -$4,441
-$5,445 Net after 2 years -$5,682
-$6,868 Net after 3 years -$6,924
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Whatsminer M50S

26.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Whatsminer M50 vs Whatsminer M50S: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M50S is more profitable at $-3.40/day compared to $-3.90/day for the Whatsminer M50. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Whatsminer M50 or Whatsminer M50S?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Whatsminer M50 or the Whatsminer M50S?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

How far apart are the Whatsminer M50 and Whatsminer M50S on J/TH?

The Whatsminer M50 runs at 29.0 J/TH while the Whatsminer M50S runs at 26.0 J/TH — a difference of 3.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 10% better efficiency (29.0 vs 26.0 J/TH).