Goldshell AL BOX III vs Antminer AL1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AL BOX III | Specification | Antminer AL1 |
|---|---|---|
| 1.3 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 16.0 TH/s |
| 600 W | Consommation électrique | 3,360 W |
| 480.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 210.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 2.2 kg | Weight | 14.5 kg |
| 2,047 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,464 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AL BOX III
Antminer AL1
Based on BTC price of $63,143 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Antminer AL1 comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 1180% more hashrate (1.3 vs 16.0 TH/s). The Goldshell AL BOX III holds the edge in consommation électrique and rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AL BOX III and Antminer AL1 sit on each measurable spec:
- Antminer AL1 1180% more hashrate (1.3 vs 16.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AL BOX III 82% better power draw (600 vs 3,360 W)
- Antminer AL1 56% better efficacité (480 vs 210 J/TH)
- Goldshell AL BOX III 85% better weight (2.2 vs 14.5 kg)
- Antminer AL1 460% more heat output (2,047 vs 11,464 BTU/hr)
- Antminer AL1 20% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AL BOX III | Metric | Antminer AL1 |
|---|---|---|
| $139 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $10,000 |
| -$1.40 | Daily net profit | -$7.61 |
| -$652 | Net after 1 year | -$12,777 |
| -$1,164 | Net after 2 years | -$15,553 |
| -$1,677 | Net after 3 years | -$18,330 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer AL1Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer AL1210.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AL BOX III or the Antminer AL1?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AL BOX III is more profitable at $-1.40/day compared to $-7.61/day for the Antminer AL1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AL BOX III vs Antminer AL1: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Antminer AL1 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Goldshell AL BOX III at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AL BOX III or Antminer AL1?
The Antminer AL1 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Goldshell AL BOX III). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AL BOX III and Antminer AL1?
The Goldshell AL BOX III runs at 480.0 J/TH while the Antminer AL1 runs at 210.0 J/TH — a difference of 270.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 56% better efficacité (480 vs 210 J/TH).