Bitmain ANTMINER XMR Miner X9
Antminer D9 vs Bitmain ANTMINER XMR Miner X9
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer D9 | Specification | Bitmain ANTMINER XMR Miner X9 |
|---|---|---|
| 1,770.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 1,000.0 KH/s |
| 2,839 W | Consommation électrique | 2,472 W |
| 1,604.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 2,472,000,000.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 76 dB |
| 16.1 kg | Weight | 17.5 kg |
| 9,687 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,435 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 33/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| X11 | Algorithme | Randomx |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer D9
Bitmain ANTMINER XMR Miner X9
Based on BTC price of $64,340 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Antminer D9 edges it: 5 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 176999900% more hashrate (1.8 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Bitmain ANTMINER XMR Miner X9 claws back ground on consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer D9 and Bitmain ANTMINER XMR Miner X9 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Antminer D9 176999900% more hashrate (1.8 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain ANTMINER XMR Miner X9 13% better power draw (2,839 vs 2,472 W)
- Antminer D9 100% better efficacité (1,604 vs 2,472,000,000 J/TH)
- Antminer D9 1% better noise (75.0 vs 76.0 dB)
- Antminer D9 8% better weight (16.1 vs 17.5 kg)
- Antminer D9 15% more heat output (9,687 vs 8,435 BTU/hr)
- Antminer D9 9% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 33.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer D9 | Metric | Bitmain ANTMINER XMR Miner X9 |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,449 |
| -$6.76 | Daily net profit | -$5.93 |
| -$5,468 | Net after 1 year | -$7,614 |
| -$7,936 | Net after 2 years | -$9,780 |
| -$10,404 | Net after 3 years | -$11,945 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer D9Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer D91,604.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer D9 or Bitmain ANTMINER XMR Miner X9 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain ANTMINER XMR Miner X9 is more profitable at $-5.93/day compared to $-6.76/day for the Antminer D9. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer D9 or the Bitmain ANTMINER XMR Miner X9 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer D9 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain ANTMINER XMR Miner X9 at 76 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer D9 vs Bitmain ANTMINER XMR Miner X9: which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer D9 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 33/100 for the Bitmain ANTMINER XMR Miner X9). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer D9 vs Bitmain ANTMINER XMR Miner X9: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer D9 runs at 1,604.0 J/TH while the Bitmain ANTMINER XMR Miner X9 runs at 2,472,000,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 2,471,998,396.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (1,604 vs 2,472,000,000 J/TH).