Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Antminer KS5 Pro

Antminer KS5 Pro

Taux de hachage 21.0 TH/s Puissance 3,150 W Efficiency 150.0 J/TH
VS
Iceriver KAS KS5M

Iceriver KAS KS5M

Taux de hachage 15.0 TH/s Puissance 3,400 W Efficiency 226.7 J/TH

Antminer KS5 Pro vs Iceriver KAS KS5M

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer KS5 Pro Specification Iceriver KAS KS5M
21.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 15.0 TH/s
3,150 W Consommation électrique 3,400 W
150.0 J/TH Efficiency 226.7 J/TH
75 dB Niveau de bruit 75 dB
14.5 kg Weight 15.0 kg
10,748 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,601 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
KHeavyHash Algorithme KHeavyHash
Bitmain Manufacturer IceRiver

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer KS5 Pro

Daily Revenue 0.00000950 BTC $0.60
Daily Electricity -$7.56
Daily Profit -$6.96
Monthly -$208.73
Yearly -$2,539.58

Iceriver KAS KS5M

Daily Revenue 0.00000679 BTC $0.43
Daily Electricity -$8.16
Daily Profit -$7.73
Monthly -$231.89
Yearly -$2,821.39

Based on BTC price of $63,390 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Antminer KS5 Pro l'emporte sur 3 des 4 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique). The standout gap is 34% better efficacité (150 vs 227 J/TH) in the Antminer KS5 Pro's favour. The Iceriver KAS KS5M claws back ground on rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Antminer KS5 Pro — l'emporte sur 3 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer KS5 Pro and Iceriver KAS KS5M sit on each measurable spec:

  • Antminer KS5 Pro 40% more hashrate (21.0 vs 15.0 TH/s)
  • Antminer KS5 Pro 7% better power draw (3,150 vs 3,400 W)
  • Antminer KS5 Pro 34% better efficacité (150 vs 227 J/TH)
  • Antminer KS5 Pro 3% better weight (14.5 vs 15.0 kg)
  • Iceriver KAS KS5M 8% more heat output (10,748 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Antminer KS5 Pro Metric Iceriver KAS KS5M
$15,000 Upfront cost (MSRP) $449
-$6.96 Daily net profit -$7.73
-$17,540 Net after 1 year -$3,270
-$20,079 Net after 2 years -$6,092
-$22,619 Net after 3 years -$8,913
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Antminer KS5 Pro

150.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Antminer KS5 Pro or the Iceriver KAS KS5M?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer KS5 Pro is more profitable at $-6.96/day compared to $-7.73/day for the Iceriver KAS KS5M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Antminer KS5 Pro vs Iceriver KAS KS5M: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Antminer KS5 Pro or Iceriver KAS KS5M?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

Antminer KS5 Pro vs Iceriver KAS KS5M: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Antminer KS5 Pro runs at 150.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS5M runs at 226.7 J/TH — a difference of 76.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 34% better efficacité (150 vs 227 J/TH).