Antminer L9 vs Goldshell E-DG1M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer L9 | Specification | Goldshell E-DG1M |
|---|---|---|
| 16,000.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 3.4 GH/s |
| 3,360 W | Consommation électrique | 1,800 W |
| 210,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 529,411.8 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 45 dB |
| 14.8 kg | Weight | 16.0 kg |
| 11,464 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,142 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 56/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer L9
Goldshell E-DG1M
Based on BTC price of $63,327 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Le Antminer L9 et le Goldshell E-DG1M sont très proches sur l'ensemble de nos facteurs de notation, sans avantage décisif pour l'un ou l'autre. Votre choix devrait dépendre de vos priorités spécifiques — consultez les spécifications et l'analyse de rentabilité ci-dessus.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer L9 and Goldshell E-DG1M diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Antminer L9 371% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell E-DG1M 46% better power draw (3,360 vs 1,800 W)
- Antminer L9 60% better efficacité (210,000 vs 529,412 J/TH)
- Goldshell E-DG1M 40% better noise (75.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- Antminer L9 8% better weight (14.8 vs 16.0 kg)
- Antminer L9 87% more heat output (11,464 vs 6,142 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell E-DG1M 56% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 56.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer L9 | Metric | Goldshell E-DG1M |
|---|---|---|
| $6,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $799 |
| -$8.06 | Daily net profit | -$4.32 |
| -$9,443 | Net after 1 year | -$2,376 |
| -$12,386 | Net after 2 years | -$3,953 |
| -$15,330 | Net after 3 years | -$5,529 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell E-DG1MScore: 56/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer L9210,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer L9 or Goldshell E-DG1M more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell E-DG1M is more profitable at $-4.32/day compared to $-8.06/day for the Antminer L9. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer L9 vs Goldshell E-DG1M: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell E-DG1M is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Antminer L9 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer L9 vs Goldshell E-DG1M: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell E-DG1M scores 56/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Antminer L9). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer L9 and Goldshell E-DG1M on J/TH?
The Antminer L9 runs at 210,000.0 J/TH while the Goldshell E-DG1M runs at 529,411.8 J/TH — a difference of 319,411.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 60% better efficacité (210,000 vs 529,412 J/TH).