Antminer S17 vs Bitaxe Hex
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer S17 | Specification | Bitaxe Hex |
|---|---|---|
| 56.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 3.0 TH/s |
| 2,520 W | Consommation électrique | 90 W |
| 45.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 30.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 45 dB |
| 9.5 kg | Weight | 0.5 kg |
| 8,598 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 307 BTU/hr |
| 84/100 | Home Mining Score | 64/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer S17
Bitaxe Hex
Based on BTC price of $62,980 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitaxe Hex edges it: 3 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, consommation électrique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 96% better power draw (2,520.0 vs 90.0 W). The Antminer S17 claws back ground on hashrate and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer S17 and Bitaxe Hex diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Antminer S17 1767% more hashrate (56.0 vs 3.0 TH/s)
- Bitaxe Hex 96% better power draw (2,520.0 vs 90.0 W)
- Bitaxe Hex 33% better efficacité (45.0 vs 30.0 J/TH)
- Bitaxe Hex 40% better noise (75.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- Bitaxe Hex 95% better weight (9.5 vs 0.5 kg)
- Antminer S17 2700% more heat output (8,598 vs 307 BTU/hr)
- Antminer S17 31% more score de minage domestique (84.0 vs 64.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer S17 | Metric | Bitaxe Hex |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $399 |
| -$4.45 | Daily net profit | -$0.13 |
| -$1,625 | Net after 1 year | -$447 |
| -$3,250 | Net after 2 years | -$494 |
| -$4,875 | Net after 3 years | -$542 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer S17Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitaxe Hex30.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer S17 or Bitaxe Hex more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe Hex is more profitable at $-0.13/day compared to $-4.45/day for the Antminer S17. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer S17 vs Bitaxe Hex: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Bitaxe Hex is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Antminer S17 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer S17 or Bitaxe Hex?
The Antminer S17 scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 64/100 for the Bitaxe Hex). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer S17 and Bitaxe Hex?
The Antminer S17 runs at 45.0 J/TH while the Bitaxe Hex runs at 30.0 J/TH — a difference of 15.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 33% better efficacité (45.0 vs 30.0 J/TH).