Antminer S17 vs NerdQAxe++
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer S17 | Specification | NerdQAxe++ |
|---|---|---|
| 56.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 4.0 TH/s |
| 2,520 W | Consommation électrique | 120 W |
| 45.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 30.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 42 dB |
| 9.5 kg | Weight | 0.5 kg |
| 8,598 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 409 BTU/hr |
| 84/100 | Home Mining Score | 58/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer S17
NerdQAxe++
Based on BTC price of $62,527 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the NerdQAxe++ edges it: 3 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, consommation électrique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 95% better power draw (2,520 vs 120 W). The Antminer S17 claws back ground on hashrate and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer S17 and NerdQAxe++ actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer S17 1300% more hashrate (56.0 vs 4.0 TH/s)
- NerdQAxe++ 95% better power draw (2,520 vs 120 W)
- NerdQAxe++ 33% better efficacité (45.0 vs 30.0 J/TH)
- NerdQAxe++ 44% better noise (75.0 vs 42.0 dB)
- NerdQAxe++ 95% better weight (9.5 vs 0.5 kg)
- Antminer S17 2000% more heat output (8,598 vs 409 BTU/hr)
- Antminer S17 45% more score de minage domestique (84.0 vs 58.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer S17 | Metric | NerdQAxe++ |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $349 |
| -$4.46 | Daily net profit | -$0.17 |
| -$1,629 | Net after 1 year | -$413 |
| -$3,259 | Net after 2 years | -$477 |
| -$4,888 | Net after 3 years | -$540 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer S17Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
NerdQAxe++30.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer S17 vs NerdQAxe++: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the NerdQAxe++ is more profitable at $-0.17/day compared to $-4.46/day for the Antminer S17. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer S17 or NerdQAxe++?
The NerdQAxe++ is quieter at 42 dB compared to the Antminer S17 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer S17 or the NerdQAxe++?
The Antminer S17 scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 58/100 for the NerdQAxe++). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer S17 vs NerdQAxe++: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer S17 runs at 45.0 J/TH while the NerdQAxe++ runs at 30.0 J/TH — a difference of 15.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 33% better efficacité (45.0 vs 30.0 J/TH).