Antminer S19 XP vs Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (104Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer S19 XP | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (104Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 140.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 104.0 TH/s |
| 3,010 W | Consommation électrique | 3,068 W |
| 21.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 29.5 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 14.4 kg | Weight | 13.2 kg |
| 10,270 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,468 BTU/hr |
| 84/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer S19 XP
Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (104Th)
Based on BTC price of $62,673 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Antminer S19 XP, which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 27% better efficacité (21.5 vs 29.5 J/TH). That said, the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (104Th) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer S19 XP and Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (104Th) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Antminer S19 XP 35% more hashrate (140 vs 104 TH/s)
- Antminer S19 XP 2% better power draw (3,010 vs 3,068 W)
- Antminer S19 XP 27% better efficacité (21.5 vs 29.5 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (104Th) 8% better weight (14.4 vs 13.2 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (104Th) 2% more heat output (10,270 vs 10,468 BTU/hr)
- Antminer S19 XP 282% more score de minage domestique (84.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer S19 XP | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (104Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $4,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $398 |
| -$3.25 | Daily net profit | -$4.41 |
| -$5,688 | Net after 1 year | -$2,009 |
| -$6,876 | Net after 2 years | -$3,621 |
| -$8,064 | Net after 3 years | -$5,232 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer S19 XPScore: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer S19 XP21.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer S19 XP vs Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (104Th): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer S19 XP is more profitable at $-3.25/day compared to $-4.41/day for the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (104Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer S19 XP or Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (104Th)?
The Antminer S19 XP is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (104Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer S19 XP or the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (104Th)?
The Antminer S19 XP scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (104Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer S19 XP and Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (104Th)?
The Antminer S19 XP runs at 21.5 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (104Th) runs at 29.5 J/TH — a difference of 8.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 27% better efficacité (21.5 vs 29.5 J/TH).