Antminer S19 XP vs Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer S19 XP | Specification | Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 140.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 10.5 TH/s |
| 3,010 W | Consommation électrique | 1,432 W |
| 21.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 136.4 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 14.4 kg | Weight | 4.2 kg |
| 10,270 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,886 BTU/hr |
| 84/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer S19 XP
Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th)
Based on BTC price of $62,673 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Antminer S19 XP edges it: 5 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 1233% more hashrate (140.0 vs 10.5 TH/s) in the Antminer S19 XP's favour. The Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) claws back ground on consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer S19 XP and Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) sit on each measurable spec:
- Antminer S19 XP 1233% more hashrate (140.0 vs 10.5 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) 52% better power draw (3,010 vs 1,432 W)
- Antminer S19 XP 84% better efficacité (21.5 vs 136.4 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) 71% better weight (14.4 vs 4.2 kg)
- Antminer S19 XP 110% more heat output (10,270 vs 4,886 BTU/hr)
- Antminer S19 XP 171% more score de minage domestique (84.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer S19 XP | Metric | Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $4,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $955 |
| -$3.25 | Daily net profit | -$3.14 |
| -$5,688 | Net after 1 year | -$2,101 |
| -$6,876 | Net after 2 years | -$3,247 |
| -$8,064 | Net after 3 years | -$4,392 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer S19 XPScore: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer S19 XP21.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer S19 XP or the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) is more profitable at $-3.14/day compared to $-3.25/day for the Antminer S19 XP. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer S19 XP or Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th)?
The Antminer S19 XP is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer S19 XP or Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th)?
The Antminer S19 XP scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer S19 XP and Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th)?
The Antminer S19 XP runs at 21.5 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) runs at 136.4 J/TH — a difference of 114.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 84% better efficacité (21.5 vs 136.4 J/TH).