Antminer S19j vs Bitaxe Gamma
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Quick verdict
For most buyers the Bitaxe Gamma is the stronger pick — it leads on 4 of 6 head-to-head factors. The Antminer S19j runs 90.0 TH/s at 34.4 J/TH; the Bitaxe Gamma runs 1,200.0 GH/s at 15 J/TH.
Specs verified against the D-Central Mining Bible \xc2\xb7 June 2026
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer S19j | Specification | Bitaxe Gamma |
|---|---|---|
| 90.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 1,200.0 GH/s |
| 3,100 W | Consommation électrique | 18 W |
| 34.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 15.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 38 dB |
| 13.0 kg | Weight | 0.3 kg |
| 10,577 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 61 BTU/hr |
| 8/100 | Home Mining Score | 100/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitaxe |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer S19j
Bitaxe Gamma
Based on BTC price of $60,332 and current network difficulty as of Jun 27, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitaxe Gamma comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 99% better power draw (3,100.0 vs 18.0 W). That said, the Antminer S19j isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer S19j and Bitaxe Gamma diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Antminer S19j 7400% more hashrate (90.0 vs 1.2 TH/s)
- Bitaxe Gamma 99% better power draw (3,100.0 vs 18.0 W)
- Bitaxe Gamma 56% better efficacité (34.4 vs 15.0 J/TH)
- Bitaxe Gamma 49% better noise (75.0 vs 38.0 dB)
- Bitaxe Gamma 98% better weight (13.0 vs 0.3 kg)
- Antminer S19j 17127% more heat output (10,577.2 vs 61.4 BTU/hr)
- Bitaxe Gamma 1150% more score de minage domestique (8.0 vs 100.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer S19j | Metric | Bitaxe Gamma |
|---|---|---|
| $2,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $99 |
| -$4.71 | Daily net profit | -$0.01 |
| -$3,718 | Net after 1 year | -$101 |
| -$5,437 | Net after 2 years | -$104 |
| -$7,155 | Net after 3 years | -$106 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitaxe GammaScore: 100/100. 38 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitaxe Gamma15.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Foire aux questions
Antminer S19j vs Bitaxe Gamma: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe Gamma is more profitable at $-0.01/day compared to $-4.71/day for the Antminer S19j. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer S19j or the Bitaxe Gamma better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Bitaxe Gamma is quieter at 38 dB compared to the Antminer S19j at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer S19j vs Bitaxe Gamma: which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitaxe Gamma scores 100/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 8/100 for the Antminer S19j). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer S19j and Bitaxe Gamma on J/TH?
The Antminer S19j runs at 34.4 J/TH while the Bitaxe Gamma runs at 15.0 J/TH — a difference of 19.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 56% better efficacité (34.4 vs 15.0 J/TH).