Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) vs Avalon A1246
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) | Specification | Avalon A1246 |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 90.0 TH/s |
| 1,372 W | Consommation électrique | 3,420 W |
| 98.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 38.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 4.2 kg | Weight | 12.3 kg |
| 4,681 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,669 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th)
Avalon A1246
Based on BTC price of $63,866 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Avalon A1246 l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 543% more hashrate (14.0 vs 90.0 TH/s). That said, the Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) and Avalon A1246 sit on each measurable spec:
- Avalon A1246 543% more hashrate (14.0 vs 90.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) 60% better power draw (1,372 vs 3,420 W)
- Avalon A1246 61% better efficacité (98.0 vs 38.0 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) 66% better weight (4.2 vs 12.3 kg)
- Avalon A1246 149% more heat output (4,681 vs 11,669 BTU/hr)
- Avalon A1246 16% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) | Metric | Avalon A1246 |
|---|---|---|
| $65 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,800 |
| -$2.89 | Daily net profit | -$5.61 |
| -$1,119 | Net after 1 year | -$3,847 |
| -$2,173 | Net after 2 years | -$5,894 |
| -$3,228 | Net after 3 years | -$7,940 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Avalon A1246Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Avalon A124638.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) or Avalon A1246 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) is more profitable at $-2.89/day compared to $-5.61/day for the Avalon A1246. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) vs Avalon A1246: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Avalon A1246 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) vs Avalon A1246: which fits a residential setup better?
The Avalon A1246 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) and Avalon A1246 on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) runs at 98.0 J/TH while the Avalon A1246 runs at 38.0 J/TH — a difference of 60.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 61% better efficacité (98.0 vs 38.0 J/TH).