Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) vs Avalon A1366
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) | Specification | Avalon A1366 |
|---|---|---|
| 16.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 130.0 TH/s |
| 1,280 W | Consommation électrique | 3,250 W |
| 80.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 25.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 4.6 kg | Weight | 12.6 kg |
| 4,367 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,089 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)
Avalon A1366
Based on BTC price of $63,866 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Avalon A1366 l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 713% more hashrate (16.0 vs 130.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) holds the edge in consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) and Avalon A1366 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Avalon A1366 713% more hashrate (16.0 vs 130.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) 61% better power draw (1,280 vs 3,250 W)
- Avalon A1366 69% better efficacité (80.0 vs 25.0 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) 63% better weight (4.6 vs 12.6 kg)
- Avalon A1366 154% more heat output (4,367 vs 11,089 BTU/hr)
- Avalon A1366 16% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) | Metric | Avalon A1366 |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,500 |
| -$2.61 | Daily net profit | -$4.04 |
| -$953 | Net after 1 year | -$4,976 |
| -$1,905 | Net after 2 years | -$6,452 |
| -$2,858 | Net after 3 years | -$7,928 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Avalon A1366Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Avalon A136625.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) or the Avalon A1366?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) is more profitable at $-2.61/day compared to $-4.04/day for the Avalon A1366. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) or Avalon A1366?
The Avalon A1366 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) or Avalon A1366?
The Avalon A1366 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) vs Avalon A1366: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) runs at 80.0 J/TH while the Avalon A1366 runs at 25.0 J/TH — a difference of 55.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 69% better efficacité (80.0 vs 25.0 J/TH).