Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) vs Whatsminer M60S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) | Specification | Whatsminer M60S |
|---|---|---|
| 23.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 186.0 TH/s |
| 1,541 W | Consommation électrique | 3,480 W |
| 67.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 18.7 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 6.6 kg | Weight | 14.0 kg |
| 5,258 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,874 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th)
Whatsminer M60S
Based on BTC price of $62,980 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Whatsminer M60S, which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 709% more hashrate (23.0 vs 186.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) claws back ground on consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) and Whatsminer M60S sit on each measurable spec:
- Whatsminer M60S 709% more hashrate (23.0 vs 186.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) 56% better power draw (1,541 vs 3,480 W)
- Whatsminer M60S 72% better efficacité (67.0 vs 18.7 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) 53% better weight (6.6 vs 14.0 kg)
- Whatsminer M60S 126% more heat output (5,258 vs 11,874 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M60S 29% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) | Metric | Whatsminer M60S |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,500 |
| -$3.04 | Daily net profit | -$3.05 |
| -$1,111 | Net after 1 year | -$6,614 |
| -$2,221 | Net after 2 years | -$7,728 |
| -$3,332 | Net after 3 years | -$8,842 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M60SScore: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M60S18.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) vs Whatsminer M60S: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) is more profitable at $-3.04/day compared to $-3.05/day for the Whatsminer M60S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) or the Whatsminer M60S better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Whatsminer M60S is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) vs Whatsminer M60S: which fits a residential setup better?
The Whatsminer M60S scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) vs Whatsminer M60S: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) runs at 67.0 J/TH while the Whatsminer M60S runs at 18.7 J/TH — a difference of 48.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 72% better efficacité (67.0 vs 18.7 J/TH).