Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Auradine Teraflux AI3680 | Specification | Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 375.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 12.0 TH/s |
| 5,625 W | Consommation électrique | 1,100 W |
| 15.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 91.7 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | 50 dB |
| — | Weight | 8.0 kg |
| 19,193 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 3,753 BTU/hr |
| — | Home Mining Score | 59/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Auradine | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Auradine Teraflux AI3680
Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition
Based on BTC price of $62,980 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Auradine Teraflux AI3680, which leads on 2 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 3025% more hashrate (375.0 vs 12.0 TH/s). The Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 and Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition sit on each measurable spec:
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 3025% more hashrate (375.0 vs 12.0 TH/s)
- Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition 80% better power draw (5,625 vs 1,100 W)
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 84% better efficacité (15.0 vs 91.7 J/TH)
- Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition 9% better noise (55.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 411% more heat output (19,193 vs 3,753 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Auradine Teraflux AI3680 | Metric | Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $499 |
| -$2.82 | Daily net profit | -$2.30 |
| -$1,028 | Net after 1 year | -$1,338 |
| -$2,055 | Net after 2 years | -$2,177 |
| -$3,083 | Net after 3 years | -$3,015 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitcoin Space Heater S9 EditionScore: 59/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Auradine Teraflux AI368015.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition is more profitable at $-2.30/day compared to $-2.82/day for the Auradine Teraflux AI3680. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 or the Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 at 55 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition: which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition scores 59/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Auradine Teraflux AI3680). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Auradine Teraflux AI3680 runs at 15.0 J/TH while the Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition runs at 91.7 J/TH — a difference of 76.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 84% better efficacité (15.0 vs 91.7 J/TH).
Compare Auradine Teraflux AI3680 with...
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Auradine Teraflux AH3880
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Auradine Teraflux AT2880
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Aisen A1 Pro
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9)
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Antminer S17
Compare Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition with...
- Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition vs Antminer S9
- Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition vs Bitcoin Space Heater S19 Edition
- Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition vs Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition
- Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition vs Bitcoin Space Heater L3 Edition
- Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition vs Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
- Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition vs Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9)
