Avalon A1246 vs Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Avalon A1246 | Specification | Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) |
|---|---|---|
| 90.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 137.0 GH/s |
| 3,420 W | Consommation électrique | 3 W |
| 38.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 18.3 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 12.3 kg | Weight | — |
| 11,669 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 9 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | — |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | Intel |
Profitability Comparison
Avalon A1246
Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)
Based on BTC price of $62,822 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
The Avalon A1246 and Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) finish in a near dead heat in our weighted scoring. There is no wrong answer here — let your electricity rate, noise tolerance and budget break the tie using the breakdowns above.
Spec Deltas
The Avalon A1246 and Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Avalon A1246 65593% more hashrate (90.0 vs 0.1 TH/s)
- Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) 100% better power draw (3,420.0 vs 2.5 W)
- Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) 52% better efficacité (38.0 vs 18.3 J/TH)
- Avalon A1246 137182% more heat output (11,669.0 vs 8.5 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Avalon A1246 | Metric | Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) |
|---|---|---|
| $1,800 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$5.65 | Daily net profit | -$0.00 |
| -$3,862 | Net after 1 year | -$1 |
| -$5,925 | Net after 2 years | -$2 |
| -$7,987 | Net after 3 years | -$2 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Avalon A1246Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)18.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Avalon A1246 or the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) is more profitable at $0.00/day compared to $-5.65/day for the Avalon A1246. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Avalon A1246 or the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Avalon A1246 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Avalon A1246 or Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)?
The Avalon A1246 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Avalon A1246 and Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) on J/TH?
The Avalon A1246 runs at 38.0 J/TH while the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) runs at 18.3 J/TH — a difference of 19.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 52% better efficacité (38.0 vs 18.3 J/TH).