Avalon A1466 vs Bitaxe GT
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Avalon A1466 | Specification | Bitaxe GT |
|---|---|---|
| 150.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 5.0 TH/s |
| 3,230 W | Consommation électrique | 75 W |
| 21.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 15.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 42 dB |
| 12.8 kg | Weight | 0.4 kg |
| 11,021 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 256 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 64/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Avalon A1466
Bitaxe GT
Based on BTC price of $62,822 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitaxe GT comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 98% better power draw (3,230.0 vs 75.0 W). The Avalon A1466 claws back ground on hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Avalon A1466 and Bitaxe GT sit on each measurable spec:
- Avalon A1466 2900% more hashrate (150.0 vs 5.0 TH/s)
- Bitaxe GT 98% better power draw (3,230.0 vs 75.0 W)
- Bitaxe GT 30% better efficacité (21.5 vs 15.0 J/TH)
- Bitaxe GT 44% better noise (75.0 vs 42.0 dB)
- Bitaxe GT 97% better weight (12.8 vs 0.4 kg)
- Avalon A1466 4207% more heat output (11,021 vs 256 BTU/hr)
- Bitaxe GT 78% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 64.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Avalon A1466 | Metric | Bitaxe GT |
|---|---|---|
| $4,200 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $499 |
| -$3.49 | Daily net profit | -$0.04 |
| -$5,473 | Net after 1 year | -$513 |
| -$6,747 | Net after 2 years | -$527 |
| -$8,020 | Net after 3 years | -$540 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitaxe GTScore: 64/100. 42 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitaxe GT15.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Avalon A1466 or Bitaxe GT more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe GT is more profitable at $-0.04/day compared to $-3.49/day for the Avalon A1466. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Avalon A1466 or the Bitaxe GT better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Bitaxe GT is quieter at 42 dB compared to the Avalon A1466 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Avalon A1466 or Bitaxe GT?
The Bitaxe GT scores 64/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Avalon A1466). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Avalon A1466 and Bitaxe GT?
The Avalon A1466 runs at 21.5 J/TH while the Bitaxe GT runs at 15.0 J/TH — a difference of 6.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 30% better efficacité (21.5 vs 15.0 J/TH).