Ebang Ebit E9.3 vs Whatsminer M60S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Ebang Ebit E9.3 | Specification | Whatsminer M60S |
|---|---|---|
| 16.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 186.0 TH/s |
| 1,760 W | Consommation électrique | 3,480 W |
| 110.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 18.7 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 6.9 kg | Weight | 14.0 kg |
| 6,005 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,874 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Ebang | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Ebang Ebit E9.3
Whatsminer M60S
Based on BTC price of $63,875 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Whatsminer M60S, which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 1063% more hashrate (16.0 vs 186.0 TH/s). The Ebang Ebit E9.3 claws back ground on consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Ebang Ebit E9.3 and Whatsminer M60S sit on each measurable spec:
- Whatsminer M60S 1063% more hashrate (16.0 vs 186.0 TH/s)
- Ebang Ebit E9.3 49% better power draw (1,760 vs 3,480 W)
- Whatsminer M60S 83% better efficacité (110.0 vs 18.7 J/TH)
- Ebang Ebit E9.3 51% better weight (6.9 vs 14.0 kg)
- Whatsminer M60S 98% more heat output (6,005 vs 11,874 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M60S 29% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Ebang Ebit E9.3 | Metric | Whatsminer M60S |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,500 |
| -$3.76 | Daily net profit | -$2.98 |
| -$1,373 | Net after 1 year | -$6,587 |
| -$2,746 | Net after 2 years | -$7,673 |
| -$4,119 | Net after 3 years | -$8,760 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M60SScore: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M60S18.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Ebang Ebit E9.3 or the Whatsminer M60S?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M60S is more profitable at $-2.98/day compared to $-3.76/day for the Ebang Ebit E9.3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Ebang Ebit E9.3 vs Whatsminer M60S: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Whatsminer M60S is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Ebang Ebit E9.3 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Ebang Ebit E9.3 or the Whatsminer M60S?
The Whatsminer M60S scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Ebang Ebit E9.3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Ebang Ebit E9.3 and Whatsminer M60S?
The Ebang Ebit E9.3 runs at 110.0 J/TH while the Whatsminer M60S runs at 18.7 J/TH — a difference of 91.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 83% better efficacité (110.0 vs 18.7 J/TH).