MicroBT Whatsminer M10S vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M78S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Quick verdict
For most buyers the MicroBT WhatsMiner M78S is the stronger pick — it leads on 3 of 4 head-to-head factors. The MicroBT Whatsminer M10S runs 55.0 TH/s at 63.6 J/TH; the MicroBT WhatsMiner M78S runs 498.0 TH/s at 13.5 J/TH.
Specs verified against the D-Central Mining Bible \xc2\xb7 June 2026
Specifications Comparison
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10S | Specification | MicroBT WhatsMiner M78S |
|---|---|---|
| 55.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 498.0 TH/s |
| 3,500 W | Consommation électrique | 6,723 W |
| 63.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 13.5 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 10.7 kg | Weight | 18.0 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 22,939 BTU/hr |
| 8/100 | Home Mining Score | 8/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| MicroBT | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
MicroBT Whatsminer M10S
MicroBT WhatsMiner M78S
Based on BTC price of $59,805 and current network difficulty as of Jun 24, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le MicroBT WhatsMiner M78S l'emporte sur 3 des 4 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 805% more hashrate (55.0 vs 498.0 TH/s) in the MicroBT WhatsMiner M78S's favour. That said, the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The MicroBT Whatsminer M10S and MicroBT WhatsMiner M78S diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M78S 805% more hashrate (55.0 vs 498.0 TH/s)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10S 48% better power draw (3,500 vs 6,723 W)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M78S 79% better efficacité (63.6 vs 13.5 J/TH)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10S 41% better weight (10.7 vs 18.0 kg)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M78S 92% more heat output (11,942 vs 22,939 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10S | Metric | MicroBT WhatsMiner M78S |
|---|---|---|
| $3,800 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$6.74 | Daily net profit | -$1.15 |
| -$6,262 | Net after 1 year | -$419 |
| -$8,724 | Net after 2 years | -$839 |
| -$11,186 | Net after 3 years | -$1,258 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
MicroBT WhatsMiner M78S13.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Foire aux questions
Which makes more money, the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S or the MicroBT WhatsMiner M78S?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT WhatsMiner M78S is more profitable at $-1.15/day compared to $-6.74/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
MicroBT Whatsminer M10S vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M78S: which runs at a lower noise level?
The MicroBT WhatsMiner M78S is quieter at 75 dB compared to the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S or the MicroBT WhatsMiner M78S?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
How far apart are the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S and MicroBT WhatsMiner M78S on J/TH?
The MicroBT Whatsminer M10S runs at 63.6 J/TH while the MicroBT WhatsMiner M78S runs at 13.5 J/TH — a difference of 50.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 79% better efficacité (63.6 vs 13.5 J/TH).