MicroBT Whatsminer M10S vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M78S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10S | Specification | MicroBT WhatsMiner M78S |
|---|---|---|
| 55.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 498.0 TH/s |
| 3,500 W | Consommation électrique | 6,723 W |
| 63.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 13.5 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 10,700.0 kg | Weight | 18.0 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 22,939 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| MicroBT | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
MicroBT Whatsminer M10S
MicroBT WhatsMiner M78S
Based on BTC price of $78,185 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le MicroBT WhatsMiner M78S l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 805% more hashrate (55.0 vs 498.0 TH/s) in the MicroBT WhatsMiner M78S's favour. That said, the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The MicroBT Whatsminer M10S and MicroBT WhatsMiner M78S diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M78S 805% more hashrate (55.0 vs 498.0 TH/s)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10S 48% better power draw (3,500 vs 6,723 W)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M78S 79% better efficacité (63.6 vs 13.5 J/TH)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M78S 100% better weight (10,700.0 vs 18.0 kg)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M78S 92% more heat output (11,942 vs 22,939 BTU/hr)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M78S 36% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10S | Metric | MicroBT WhatsMiner M78S |
|---|---|---|
| $3,800 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$6.42 | Daily net profit | $1.78 |
| -$6,144 | Net after 1 year | +$651 |
| -$8,487 | Net after 2 years | +$1,301 |
| -$10,831 | Net after 3 years | +$1,952 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
MicroBT WhatsMiner M78S$8.20/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
MicroBT WhatsMiner M78SScore: 30/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
MicroBT WhatsMiner M78S13.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S or the MicroBT WhatsMiner M78S?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT WhatsMiner M78S is more profitable at $1.78/day compared to $-6.42/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
MicroBT Whatsminer M10S vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M78S: which runs at a lower noise level?
The MicroBT WhatsMiner M78S is quieter at 75 dB compared to the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S or the MicroBT WhatsMiner M78S?
The MicroBT WhatsMiner M78S scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S and MicroBT WhatsMiner M78S on J/TH?
The MicroBT Whatsminer M10S runs at 63.6 J/TH while the MicroBT WhatsMiner M78S runs at 13.5 J/TH — a difference of 50.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 79% better efficacité (63.6 vs 13.5 J/TH).