Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)

Hashrate 750.0 MH/s Power 1,350 W Efficiency 1,800,000.0 J/TH

iPollo V2H

Hashrate 3.4 GH/s Power 475 W Efficiency 139,705.9 J/TH

Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs iPollo V2H

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)	Specification	iPollo V2H
750.0 MH/s	Hashrate	3.4 GH/s
1,350 W	Power Consumption	475 W
1,800,000.0 J/TH	Efficiency	139,705.9 J/TH
—	Noise Level	65 dB
8,100.0 kg	Weight	7.9 kg
4,606 BTU/hr	BTU Output	1,621 BTU/hr
31/100	Home Mining Score	55/100
—	Release Year	—
EtHash	Algorithm	EtHash
Innosilicon	Manufacturer	iPollo

Profitability Comparison

Electricity Rate:

$/kWh

Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00

Daily Electricity -$3.24

Daily Profit -$3.24

Monthly -$97.20

Yearly -$1,182.59

iPollo V2H

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00

Daily Electricity -$1.14

Daily Profit -$1.14

Monthly -$34.20

Yearly -$416.06

Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the iPollo V2H comes out ahead — it takes 6 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). The standout gap is 92% better efficiency (1,800,000 vs 139,706 J/TH) in the iPollo V2H's favour. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: iPollo V2H — wins on 6 of 6 factors

Spec Deltas

The Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) and iPollo V2H diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

iPollo V2H 353% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
iPollo V2H 65% better power draw (1,350 vs 475 W)
iPollo V2H 92% better efficiency (1,800,000 vs 139,706 J/TH)
iPollo V2H 100% better weight (8,100.0 vs 7.9 kg)
Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) 184% more heat output (4,606 vs 1,621 BTU/hr)
iPollo V2H 77% more home mining score (31.0 vs 55.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)	Metric	iPollo V2H
$800	Upfront cost (MSRP)	$1,850
-$3.24	Daily net profit	-$1.14
-$1,983	Net after 1 year	-$2,266
-$3,165	Net after 2 years	-$2,682
-$4,348	Net after 3 years	-$3,098
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)	Payback period	Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

iPollo V2H

Score: 55/100. 65 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

iPollo V2H

139,705.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) or the iPollo V2H?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V2H is more profitable at $-1.14/day compared to $-3.24/day for the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) or iPollo V2H?

The iPollo V2H is quieter at 65 dB compared to the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) or iPollo V2H?

The iPollo V2H scores 55/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) and iPollo V2H?

The Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) runs at 1,800,000.0 J/TH while the iPollo V2H runs at 139,705.9 J/TH — a difference of 1,660,294.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 92% better efficiency (1,800,000 vs 139,706 J/TH).

Compare Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) with...

Compare iPollo V2H with...

Shop Miners Browse our full catalog of ASIC miners, Bitaxe, and accessories. ASIC Repair 2,500+ miners repaired. Expert diagnostics and board-level repair. Miner Database Compare 500+ miners with live profitability data.