Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell HS3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Specification | Goldshell HS3 |
|---|---|---|
| 37.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 2.0 TH/s |
| 360 W | Power Consumption | 2,000 W |
| 9,729,729.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,000.0 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 2.3 kg | Weight | 7,000.0 kg |
| 1,228 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,824 BTU/hr |
| 69/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2b-sia |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX
Goldshell HS3
Based on BTC price of $76,751 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell HS3 edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 5405305% more hashrate (0.0 vs 2.0 TH/s). The Goldshell AE-BOX holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell HS3 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell HS3 5405305% more hashrate (0.0 vs 2.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 82% better power draw (360 vs 2,000 W)
- Goldshell HS3 100% better efficiency (9,729,730 vs 1,000 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 100% better weight (2.3 vs 7,000.0 kg)
- Goldshell HS3 456% more heat output (1,228 vs 6,824 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 146% more home mining score (69.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Metric | Goldshell HS3 |
|---|---|---|
| $100 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,100 |
| -$0.86 | Daily net profit | -$4.73 |
| -$415 | Net after 1 year | -$2,826 |
| -$731 | Net after 2 years | -$4,552 |
| -$1,046 | Net after 3 years | -$6,279 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOXScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell HS31,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE-BOX or Goldshell HS3 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX is more profitable at $-0.86/day compared to $-4.73/day for the Goldshell HS3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE-BOX or Goldshell HS3?
The Goldshell AE-BOX is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell HS3 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE-BOX or Goldshell HS3?
The Goldshell AE-BOX scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Goldshell HS3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell HS3: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE-BOX runs at 9,729,729.7 J/TH while the Goldshell HS3 runs at 1,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 9,728,729.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,729,730 vs 1,000 J/TH).