Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell HS3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Goldshell HS3 |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 2.0 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Power Consumption | 2,000 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,000.0 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 7,000.0 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,824 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2b-sia |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Goldshell HS3
Based on BTC price of $76,909 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Goldshell HS3 wins on 4 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 1,000 J/TH). That said, the Goldshell AE Max isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell HS3 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell HS3 555456% more hashrate (0.0 vs 2.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell HS3 39% better power draw (3,300 vs 2,000 W)
- Goldshell HS3 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 1,000 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Max 100% better weight (13.5 vs 7,000.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max 65% more heat output (11,260 vs 6,824 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Max 79% more home mining score (50.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Goldshell HS3 |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,100 |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$4.73 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$2,826 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$4,552 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$6,278 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE MaxScore: 50/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell HS31,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell HS3: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell HS3 is more profitable at $-4.73/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell HS3: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE Max is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Goldshell HS3 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell HS3?
The Goldshell AE Max scores 50/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Goldshell HS3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell HS3 on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell HS3 runs at 1,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 9,165,666.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 1,000 J/TH).