Goldshell AE Card vs Goldshell HS3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Card | Specification | Goldshell HS3 |
|---|---|---|
| 5.5 MH/s | Hashrate | 2.0 TH/s |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 2,000 W |
| 11,818,181.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,000.0 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 0.3 kg | Weight | 7,000.0 kg |
| 222 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,824 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2b-sia |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Card
Goldshell HS3
Based on BTC price of $76,909 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell HS3 comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 36363536% more hashrate (0.0 vs 2.0 TH/s). The Goldshell AE Card claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score and noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE Card and Goldshell HS3 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell HS3 36363536% more hashrate (0.0 vs 2.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE Card 97% better power draw (65.0 vs 2,000.0 W)
- Goldshell HS3 100% better efficiency (11,818,182 vs 1,000 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Card 100% better weight (0.3 vs 7,000.0 kg)
- Goldshell HS3 2977% more heat output (222 vs 6,824 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Card 154% more home mining score (71.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE Card | Metric | Goldshell HS3 |
|---|---|---|
| $99 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,100 |
| -$0.16 | Daily net profit | -$4.73 |
| -$156 | Net after 1 year | -$2,826 |
| -$213 | Net after 2 years | -$4,552 |
| -$270 | Net after 3 years | -$6,278 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE CardScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell HS31,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE Card or Goldshell HS3 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE Card is more profitable at $-0.16/day compared to $-4.73/day for the Goldshell HS3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE Card or the Goldshell HS3 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell AE Card is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell HS3 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE Card vs Goldshell HS3: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell AE Card scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Goldshell HS3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE Card and Goldshell HS3 on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE Card runs at 11,818,181.8 J/TH while the Goldshell HS3 runs at 1,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 11,817,181.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (11,818,182 vs 1,000 J/TH).