Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell HS3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell HS3 |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 2.0 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 2,000 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,000.0 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 7,000.0 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,824 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2b-sia |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell HS3
Based on BTC price of $76,909 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell HS3 comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 1,000 J/TH). The Goldshell AE Max II holds the edge in home mining score and noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell HS3 sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell HS3 370270% more hashrate (0.0 vs 2.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell HS3 38% better power draw (3,200 vs 2,000 W)
- Goldshell HS3 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 1,000 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Max II 100% better weight (12.5 vs 7,000.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max II 60% more heat output (10,918 vs 6,824 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Max II 4% more home mining score (29.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell HS3 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,100 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$4.73 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$2,826 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$4,552 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$6,278 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE Max IIScore: 29/100. 85 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell HS31,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell HS3?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell HS3 is more profitable at $-4.73/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell HS3: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE Max II is quieter at 85 dB compared to the Goldshell HS3 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell HS3?
The Goldshell AE Max II scores 29/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Goldshell HS3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell HS3 on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell HS3 runs at 1,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 5,924,925.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 1,000 J/TH).