Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell HS3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Specification | Goldshell HS3 |
|---|---|---|
| 54.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 2.0 TH/s |
| 530 W | Power Consumption | 2,000 W |
| 9,814,814.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,000.0 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 3.0 kg | Weight | 7,000.0 kg |
| 1,808 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,824 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2b-sia |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX II
Goldshell HS3
Based on BTC price of $76,909 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell HS3, which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 3703604% more hashrate (0.0 vs 2.0 TH/s). The Goldshell AE-BOX II claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell HS3 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell HS3 3703604% more hashrate (0.0 vs 2.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 74% better power draw (530 vs 2,000 W)
- Goldshell HS3 100% better efficiency (9,814,815 vs 1,000 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 100% better weight (3.0 vs 7,000.0 kg)
- Goldshell HS3 277% more heat output (1,808 vs 6,824 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 132% more home mining score (65.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Metric | Goldshell HS3 |
|---|---|---|
| $120 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,100 |
| -$1.27 | Daily net profit | -$4.73 |
| -$584 | Net after 1 year | -$2,826 |
| -$1,049 | Net after 2 years | -$4,552 |
| -$1,513 | Net after 3 years | -$6,278 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOX IIScore: 65/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell HS31,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE-BOX II or the Goldshell HS3?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX II is more profitable at $-1.27/day compared to $-4.73/day for the Goldshell HS3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell HS3: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell HS3 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE-BOX II or Goldshell HS3?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Goldshell HS3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell HS3?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II runs at 9,814,814.8 J/TH while the Goldshell HS3 runs at 1,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 9,813,814.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,814,815 vs 1,000 J/TH).