Antminer AL1 vs Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer AL1 | Specification | Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| 16.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 1,770.0 GH/s |
| 3,360 W | Power Consumption | 2,839 W |
| 210.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,604.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 14.5 kg | Weight | 16.1 kg |
| 11,464 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 9,687 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithm | X11 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer AL1
Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh)
Based on BTC price of $78,139 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Antminer AL1 wins on 4 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 804% more hashrate (16.0 vs 1.8 TH/s). That said, the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer AL1 and Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer AL1 804% more hashrate (16.0 vs 1.8 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) 16% better power draw (3,360 vs 2,839 W)
- Antminer AL1 87% better efficiency (210 vs 1,604 J/TH)
- Antminer AL1 10% better weight (14.5 vs 16.1 kg)
- Antminer AL1 18% more heat output (11,464 vs 9,687 BTU/hr)
- Antminer AL1 64% more home mining score (36.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer AL1 | Metric | Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| $10,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,030 |
| -$7.49 | Daily net profit | -$6.75 |
| -$12,733 | Net after 1 year | -$3,494 |
| -$15,467 | Net after 2 years | -$5,957 |
| -$18,200 | Net after 3 years | -$8,421 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer AL1Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer AL1210.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer AL1 vs Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) is more profitable at $-6.75/day compared to $-7.49/day for the Antminer AL1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer AL1 vs Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh): which runs at a lower noise level?
The Antminer AL1 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer AL1 vs Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh): which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer AL1 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer AL1 and Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh)?
The Antminer AL1 runs at 210.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) runs at 1,604.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,394.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 87% better efficiency (210 vs 1,604 J/TH).