Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) vs Baikal Miner Cube
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) | Specification | Baikal Miner Cube |
|---|---|---|
| 1,770.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 300.0 MH/s |
| 2,839 W | Power Consumption | 90 W |
| 1,604.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 300,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 16.1 kg | Weight | — |
| 9,687 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 307 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| X11 | Algorithm | X11 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Baikal |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh)
Baikal Miner Cube
Based on BTC price of $78,139 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 589900% more hashrate (1.8 vs 0.0 TH/s). That said, the Baikal Miner Cube isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) and Baikal Miner Cube diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) 589900% more hashrate (1.8 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Baikal Miner Cube 97% better power draw (2,839.0 vs 90.0 W)
- Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) 99% better efficiency (1,604 vs 300,000 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) 3054% more heat output (9,687 vs 307 BTU/hr)
- Baikal Miner Cube 64% more home mining score (22.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) | Metric | Baikal Miner Cube |
|---|---|---|
| $1,030 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,000 |
| -$6.75 | Daily net profit | -$0.22 |
| -$3,494 | Net after 1 year | -$1,079 |
| -$5,957 | Net after 2 years | -$1,158 |
| -$8,421 | Net after 3 years | -$1,236 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Baikal Miner CubeScore: 36/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh)1,604.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) or Baikal Miner Cube more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal Miner Cube is more profitable at $-0.22/day compared to $-6.75/day for the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) or Baikal Miner Cube?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) vs Baikal Miner Cube: which fits a residential setup better?
The Baikal Miner Cube scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) and Baikal Miner Cube on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer D9 (1770Gh) runs at 1,604.0 J/TH while the Baikal Miner Cube runs at 300,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 298,396.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 99% better efficiency (1,604 vs 300,000 J/TH).