Bitmain Antminer HS3 vs Goldshell HS6 SE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer HS3 | Specification | Goldshell HS6 SE |
|---|---|---|
| 9.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 3.7 TH/s |
| 2,079 W | Power Consumption | 3,400 W |
| 231.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 918.9 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 16,100.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 7,094 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2b+sha3 | Algorithm | Blake2b+sha3 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer HS3
Goldshell HS6 SE
Based on BTC price of $76,967 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer HS3 edges it: 5 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, price-performance). The standout gap is 75% better efficiency (231 vs 919 J/TH) in the Bitmain Antminer HS3's favour. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer HS3 and Goldshell HS6 SE diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer HS3 143% more hashrate (9.0 vs 3.7 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer HS3 39% better power draw (2,079 vs 3,400 W)
- Bitmain Antminer HS3 75% better efficiency (231 vs 919 J/TH)
- Goldshell HS6 SE 64% more heat output (7,094 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer HS3 18% more home mining score (26.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer HS3 | Metric | Goldshell HS6 SE |
|---|---|---|
| $900 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,060 |
| -$4.67 | Daily net profit | -$8.03 |
| -$2,605 | Net after 1 year | -$3,991 |
| -$4,310 | Net after 2 years | -$6,921 |
| -$6,015 | Net after 3 years | -$9,852 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer HS3Score: 26/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer HS3231.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer HS3 or Goldshell HS6 SE more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer HS3 is more profitable at $-4.67/day compared to $-8.03/day for the Goldshell HS6 SE. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer HS3 vs Goldshell HS6 SE: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer HS3 or Goldshell HS6 SE?
The Bitmain Antminer HS3 scores 26/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell HS6 SE). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer HS3 vs Goldshell HS6 SE: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer HS3 runs at 231.0 J/TH while the Goldshell HS6 SE runs at 918.9 J/TH — a difference of 687.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 75% better efficiency (231 vs 919 J/TH).