Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 53.0 TH/s |
| 1,350 W | Power Consumption | 2,385 W |
| 96.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 45.0 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 6.0 kg | Weight | 9,500.0 kg |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,138 BTU/hr |
| 59/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th), which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 279% more hashrate (14.0 vs 53.0 TH/s). The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) 279% more hashrate (14.0 vs 53.0 TH/s)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 43% better power draw (1,350 vs 2,385 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) 53% better efficiency (96.4 vs 45.0 J/TH)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 100% better weight (6.0 vs 9,500.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) 77% more heat output (4,606 vs 8,138 BTU/hr)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 127% more home mining score (59.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $349 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $274 |
| -$2.74 | Daily net profit | -$3.82 |
| -$1,348 | Net after 1 year | -$1,667 |
| -$2,346 | Net after 2 years | -$3,060 |
| -$3,345 | Net after 3 years | -$4,453 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)Score: 59/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th)45.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) is more profitable at $-2.74/day compared to $-3.82/day for the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th)?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th)?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) scores 59/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th)?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) runs at 96.4 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) runs at 45.0 J/TH — a difference of 51.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 53% better efficiency (96.4 vs 45.0 J/TH).